2. Discovery Expanded for Speeding Tickets State v Green __ NJ Super. __ A-6199-08T4 11-09-10 In this case, the court decided that a motorist who has been charged with speeding is entitled to discovery respecting, (1) The speed-measuring device's make, model, and description; (2) The history of the officer's training on that speed-measuring device, where he was trained, and who trained him; (3) The training manuals for the speed-measuring device and its operating manuals; (4) the State's training manuals and operating manuals for the speed-measuring device; (5) the officer's log book of tickets written on the day of defendant's alleged violation; (6) the repair history of the speed-measuring device used to determine defendant's speed for the past twelve months; and (7) any engineering and speed studies used to set the speed limit at the section of highway where defendant's speed was measured. The court also found that the Stalker Lidar speed-measuring device had not been proven to be scientifically reliable and, as such, the results of its operation should not have been admitted during the municipal court proceedings or considered by the Law Division. The court remanded the matter to the Law Division for a plenary hearing on the scientific reliability of the Stalker Lidar. If it is determined to be reliable, then the matter is remanded to the municipal court for trial after the State has provided all of the discovery required by this opinion. |