2053 Woodbridge Avenue - Edison, NJ 08817

Wednesday, July 16, 2014

NJ LAWS EMAIL NEWLETTER E431 Kenneth Vercammen, Attorney at Law In this Issue: 1. Investigator violated rules by destroying notes. 2. Cellphone can't be tracked without warrant. 3. Landlord could call police to advise saw drugs. 4. Next Events, Reminder: Holiday Happy Hour & Networking Social, Friday, December 6, 2013; 5:00PM - 7:00PM Bar A, Belmar



NJ LAWS EMAIL NEWLETTER E431
Kenneth Vercammen, Attorney at Law

In this Issue:

1. Investigator violated rules by destroying notes.

2. Cellphone can't be tracked without warrant.

3. Landlord could call police to advise saw drugs.

4. Next Events, Reminder: Holiday Happy Hour & Networking Social, Friday, December
6, 2013;  5:00PM - 7:00PM Bar A, Belmar


1. Investigator violated rules by destroying notes. State v. Dabas __ NJ __ (2013)(A-109-11)

The prosecutor's office violated its post-indictment discovery obligations under
 Rule 3:13-3, when its investigator destroyed his notes of a two-hour pre-interview
of defendant. The trial court abused its discretion in denying defendant's request
for a charge that would have allowed the jury to draw an adverse inference from
the destruction of the interview notes more than a year after the return of the
indictment.

2. Cellphone can't be tracked without warrant State v. Earls __ NJ __ (2013)( A-53-11)

Article I, Paragraph 7 of the New Jersey Constitution protects an individual's privacy
interest in the location of his or her cell phone. Police must obtain a warrant
based on a showing of probable cause, or qualify for an exception to the warrant
 requirement, to obtain tracking information through the use of a cell phone.

3. Landlord could call police to advise saw drugs State v Wright __ NJ Super. __
 (App. Div. 2013) A-4813-10T1

This appeal concerns the "third-party intervention" (or "private search") doctrine,
which courts have applied in authorizing the police to inspect or search a defendant's
property in certain instances without a warrant, so long as the police do not exceed
the scope of the private actor's intrusion that led to the police's involvement.

The trial court relied upon this doctrine in denying defendant's motion to suppress
drugs and other incriminating evidence seized by the police from his girlfriend's
apartment. The landlord had entered the apartment at the girlfriend's request to
 repair a leak. While he was there, the landlord observed drugs on a nightstand
and, in fear, he called the police. The police responded to the scene, were let
into the apartment by the landlord, and confirmed his observation of the drugs and
other contraband in open view. The girlfriend then arrived and the police secured
her consent to a search of the apartment, through which they found a gun and other
evidence of criminal conduct.

Given the heightened constitutional protection that the Fourth Amendment of the
United States Constitution and Article 1, paragraph 7 of the New Jersey Constitution
accord to the privacy of residential premises, the court joins with several other
courts in limiting the extent to which the third-party intervention doctrine may
 authorize warrantless police searches of private residences. In particular, the
 court holds that, at the very least, the doctrine does not apply in situations
where the third party who provides the police with access to a dwelling has entered
it unlawfully or otherwise in violation of the resident's property rights or her
 reasonable privacy expectations. Apart from that limitation, the doctrine also
should not apply if the totality of the intrusion by the private party and law enforcement
officials is objectively unreasonable.

Because these residency-related limitations were not violated here, the court affirmed
the denial of the suppression motion and defendant's ensuing conviction.

4. Next Events

Tue, Dec 10 @ 6:00p

Annual Young Lawyers Holiday Brew Ho-Ho [http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?t=ze9oujpab.0.0.ijlzbhpab.0&id=preview&r=3&p=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mcbalaw.com%2Fcde.cfm%3Fevent%3D391362]

Mike's Courtside Tavern

1 Elm Row

New Brunswick

Heavy Hors D'oeuvres, Open Bar, Games, Co-Sponsored by the NJSBA Young Lawyers Lawyers
Division

Cost: $20 Law Clerks; $30 Young Lawyers; $40 MCBA Members; and $60 All Others

_________________________________________________

REMINDER:
Clients,
Friends, Attorneys Professionals, Business owners and their staff invited to Holiday
Happy Hour & Networking Social
Friday, December 6, 2013
5:00PM - 7:00PM
at Bar Anticipation
703 16th Avenue
Lake Como/ Belmar, NJ 07719
Free !
5-7PM Hot & Cold Buffet with carving station

The reduced price Happy Hour is 6-7PM with $1 House Drink, Bud/BudLt draft & House
Wine Special
Sorry if this is a Duplicate but we did not want to miss anyone

Please bring a canned food donation for the St. James Food Bank Hands of Hope, continuing
providing food and help to individuals in need.

Email Ken Vercammen's Law Office so we can put your name on the VIP list for wristbands
@ VercammenLaw@Njlaws.com
Https://www.facebook.com/events/595540683835671/

Co-Sponsored by this year the NJSBA Municipal Court Section, Solo & Small Firm Division,
Criminal Law Section, Young Lawyers Division, Family Law Section, Entertainment
Arts & Sports Law Section, Banking Law Section, Women in the Profession Section,
 Minorities in the Profession Section, LGBT Rights Section, Government & Public
Sector Lawyers Special Committee.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~