NJ Laws Email Newsletter E295
Kenneth Vercammen, Attorney at Law
February 12, 2009
In This Issue
1. Herniated Disc
Not Always Permanent Injury.
2. Municipal Court cannot Access
3. Penalty cannot
be Enhanced if
Prior Statute was Ambiguous.
4. Failure of Owner
to Cooperate with Insurance Company can Void Coverage
5. February & March Community Events.
6. More Video & Legal podcast added to YouTube this week.
Main Website with 500 + articles and 1,000 + links
Greetings Kenneth Vercammen,
1. Herniated Disc Not Always Permanent Injury.
Ames v. Gopal 12-09-08 A-2522-07T1
The Appellate Division held Plaintiff was not entitled at trial to an instruction that a herniated disc constitutes a permanent injury, entitling him to non-economic damages. The Appellate Division reduced Pardo v. Dominguez 382 N.J. Super. 489 (App. Div. 2006).
2. Municipal Court cannot Access Penalty for Consumer Fraud. State v. Tri-Way Kars, Inc. 402 NJ Super. 215 (App. Div. Decided August 5, 2008) A-1256-07T4
The court held that a municipal court had no jurisdiction under N.J.S.A. 56:8-14 to assess a penalty for an alleged Consumer Fraud Act violation in connection with the sale of a used motor vehicle because N.J.S.A. 56:8-14 only grants jurisdiction over penalty enforcement actions.
The court also held that the Central Municipal Court of Bergen County had no jurisdiction under N.J.S.A. 56:8-14.1 to assess such a penalty because that statute expressly limits jurisdiction over penalty assessment cases to municipalities "where the offense was committed or where the defendant may be found." Here, the offense was committed in South Hackensack where defendant conducted business and we concluded that this specific statute trumped the general power of the Assignment Judge to refer cases to the Central Municipal Court under N.J.S.A. 2B:12-1(e).
Finally, the court provided guidance for future actions respecting the insufficiency of the municipal court "Complaint-Summons SF-1 and SF-2" to adequately provide notice of the essential facts of a penalty assessment action, as opposed to a penalty enforcement action where the use of these forms has been approved by the Administrative Office of the Courts.
3. Penalty cannot be Enhanced if Prior Statute was Ambiguous. State v. Gelman 195 NJ 475 ( 2008) A-42
The current N.J.S.A. 2C:34-1 is insolubly ambiguous concerning whether a defendant can be charged with the fourth-degree crime of prostitution based on a prior petty disorderly persons conviction under the predecessor statute. The Court is thus compelled to apply the doctrine of lenity and dismiss the indictment.
4. Failure of Owner to Cooperate with Insurance Company can Void Coverage. Hager v. Gonsalves 398 NJ Super. 529 (App. Div. 2008) A-4293-06T1
The failure of both the operator and the owner of a motor vehicle to cooperate with the vehicle's insurer, thus preventing the insurer from ascertaining whether the operator was a permissive user at the time of the subject accident, may provide sufficient grounds for the insurer to disclaim coverage.
5. February & March Community Events:
Feb 21-Wrestling District Championships.
Brendan Vercammen made finals of Middlesex County Championships. Top record on team- 14 pins at 171, 189 & 215
Feb. 22 Irish Cocktail - K of C Avenel
Feb. 23 NJ Bar Municipal Court Meeting
MARCH - 2009
March 1 Belmar Parade (1st Sunday)
March 6 Friendly Sons Friday
March 8 St Patrick Parade - Woodbridge
March 28 NJSBA MUN 4-6
March 18 Middlesex Bar Awards Dinner - Sunny Palace, East Brunswick
March 23 Edison Chamber - Taste of Middlesex-Pines
6. More Video & Legal podcast added YouTube. We have added a weekly online podcast with a video/audio description of recent cases by the NJ Supreme Court and NJ Appellate Division and changes in Probate Law.
This week on the Kenneth Vercammen YouTube channel:
Inheritance Tax Returns
Federal Estate & Gift Tax changes
Thank you for reading our newsletter! God Bless America USA #1
Our hope is that every one of our current subscribers will sign up at least one friend as a new subscriber to the NJ Laws Newsletter. If you know someone who would also like to receive this email newsletter, please have them email us at firstname.lastname@example.org or click here.
Our Law blogs:
NJ Criminal Law Blog: http://njcriminallaw.blogspot.com/
NJ Personal Injury & Civil Law Blog: http://njlawspersonalinjury.blogspot.com/
NJ Elder Law Blog: http://elder-law.blogspot.com/
We appreciate continued referrals. We want to take the time to extend to our friends and clients our sincere gratitude because it is good friends and clients that make our business grow. Client recommendation is a very important source of new clients to us. We are grateful for the recommendation of new clients. We will do our best to give all clients excellent care. We shall do our best to justify all recommendations.
"Celebrating more than 23 years of providing excellent service to clients 1985-2009" Former Prosecutor.
Free T- shirts and soda can holders available for all current and past clients. Please come into the office.
Editor's Note and Disclaimer:
All materials Copyright 2009. You may pass along the information on the NJ Laws Newsletter and website, provided the name and address of the Law Office is included.
KENNETH VERCAMMEN & ASSOCIATES, PC
ATTORNEY AT LAW
2053 Woodbridge Ave.
Edison, NJ 08817
Admitted to practice law in New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, US Supreme Court and Federal District Court