In this issue:
1. Friday, May 25- The Legends of Belmar Volleyball
2. DNA Testing of Criminals Does Not Violate Constitution
3 DNA Testing of Juvenile Criminals Constitutional
4. Receipt of Nine Checks Not a Criminal Enterprise to Deny PTI
5. Fire Investigators Can Remain on Scene and Seize Items in Plain View
1. Friday, May 25- The Legends of Belmar Volleyball- Join the Greats of Belmar beach- Marty, John C. Billy Ball, Jim Watt, Ken Vercammen & others at D'Jay's, Bar A & other fun spots. Run the Spring Lake 5 at 8:30 am the next morning. Exciting start to Memorial Day and the Summer.
2. DNA Testing of Criminals Does Not Violate Constitution. State v. O'Hagen 189 NJ 140 (2007).
The New Jersey DNA Database and Databank Act of N.J.S.A. 53:1- 20.17-20.28, as amended, does not violate the rights guaranteed by the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution and Article I, Paragraphs 1 and 7 of the New Jersey Constitution.
3 DNA Testing of Juvenile Criminals Constitutional. A.A. v. Attorney General of New Jersey 189 NJ 129 (2007).
DNA test results lawfully obtained pursuant to the New Jersey DNA Database and Databank Act of 1994, N.J.S.A. 53:1-20.17- 20.28, as amended, may be used to solve crimes committed prior to the taking of the DNA test.
4. Receipt of Nine Checks Not a Criminal Enterprise to Deny PTI. State v. Watkins 390 NJ Super. 302 (App. Div. 2007).
In this appeal from a denial of defendant's appeal of his rejection from pre-trial intervention (PTI), The court addressed the meaning of PTI Guideline 3(i)(2), which directs consideration of whether the crime was "part of a continuing criminal business or enterprise". Reviewing the prior cases that have addressed this Guideline, The court concludes that the Prosecutor and the reviewing judge erroneously applied Guideline 3(i)(2) to the facts of this case which involved improper receipt of unemployment checks over a four-month period. Defendant's conduct did not possess the characteristics of a "business" or "enterprise" nor did it persist for a long enough period to be deemed "continuing," as that phrase has been applied in earlier cases. As a result, The court remanded to the Prosecutor for reconsideration of defendant's application without consideration of Guideline 3(i)(2).
5. Fire Investigators Can Remain on Scene and Seize Items in Plain View. State v. Amodio 390 NJ Super 313 (App. Div. 2007).
In this matter, defendant was convicted of passion/provocation manslaughter, felony murder, arson and other offenses arising from the death of his girlfriend and her son in a fire at defendant's home. The court held that: 1) evidence obtained by the police and other officials in the fire-damaged home was properly seized without a warrant because the evidence was found during an investigation into the cause and origin of the fire, which was conducted within a reasonable time after the fire had been extinguished; and 2) the warrantless seizure of defendant's clothes was permissible because those garments had been removed from defendant in order to provide emergency medical assistance.
_____________________________
Our law blog- http://njlaws1.blogspot.com/
Thank you for reading our newsletter! God Bless America USA #1
We appreciate continued referrals. We want to take the time to extend to our friends and clients our sincere gratitude because it is good friends and clients that make our business grow. Client recommendation is a very important source of new clients to us. We are grateful for the recommendation of new clients. We will do our best to give all clients excellent care. We shall do our best to justify all recommendations.
"Celebrating more than 21 years of providing excellent service to clients 1985-2007" Former Prosecutor
This newsletter is produced to be sent electronically. If you know someone who would also like to receive this email newsletter, please have them email us at newsletter@njlaws.com.
Free T- shirts and soda can holders available for all current and past clients. Please come into office.
Editor's Note and Disclaimer: All materials Copyright 2007. You may pass along the information on the NJ Laws Newsletter and website, provided the name and address of the Law Office is included.
KENNETH VERCAMMEN & ASSOCIATES, PC
ATTORNEY AT LAW
2053 Woodbridge Ave.
Edison, NJ 08817
(Phone) 732-572-0500
(Fax) 732-572-0030
website: www.njlaws.com
Admitted to practice law in New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, US Supreme Court and Federal District Court
Friday, July 20, 2007
NJ Laws Newsletter E243 April 25, 2007
Kenneth Vercammen's NJ Laws email newsletter E243
April 25, 2007
In this issue:
1. Real Estate Sales
2. Yearly Insurance Review
3 DWI suppression affirmed where reasons for ordering sobriety test not "reasonable suspicion."
4. Defendant can be guilty of .08 DWI even though Breath machine calibrated at .10 level
1. Real Estate Sales
To better serve our Probate and Senior citizen clients, Kenneth Vercammen has taken and passed the NJ Real Estate Salesperson test. The examination consists of numerous questions taken over a 4 hour period. Mr. Vercammen is now also a licensed real estate agent, is affiliated with Century 21, John Anthony Agency on 1815 Oak Tree Rd., Edison, NJ. Century 21 is one of the largest real estate agencies in the country. http://www.century21johnanthony.com/
If you will be selling a house, please give Kenneth Vercammen a call. Do not pay a 6% commission, but also don't rely on a 2% agency that merely lists your home on the internet, then expects you to do all the work.
SELLERS INFORMATION SHEET
The sale of a home is probably the largest transaction a person will ever undertake. Careful consideration should be given to the technical difficulties involved in the transfer.
The Contract of Sale
A Contract of Sale is an agreement for the purchase and sale of real estate. This is the most important document in any real estate transaction because it establishes the respective rights and responsibilities of the purchaser and the seller.
Since the Contract of Sale is important and legally binding New Jersey requires a 3 day attorney review period on Contracts prepared by a realtor. Please read the contract before signing. If you have any questions, please ask your real estate agent. If there are any clauses you want added, such as the house sale "As is", make sure they are added to the Contract before signing.
The 3 day attorney review period is to protect the buyer and seller from being forever bound by a contract without them receiving the benefit of legal advice. You only have three days to have your attorney review the contract and make the appropriate changes. Remember that once a Contract is signed and in final form after 3 days, your rights and obligations are fixed concerning the transaction. Your attorney will no longer have the opportunity to structure the Contract to meet your objectives.
Read and Understand the Contract Before Signing your Contract of Sale
Perhaps the seller may want to retain possession of the property for some time in order to find new accommodations. You should make sure these clauses are included in the contract defining such rights prior to signing. Never sign a contract involving the sale or purchase of real estate until you have done the following:
1. read the entire contract
2. written down your questions and posed them to your realtor
3. made sure all your requested clauses are included, such as the house being sold "as is"
These are only a few matters usually covered in the contract. However, they illustrate the variety of terms and conditions to be considered when you enter into such a transaction.
FEE AGREEMENT BY THE SELLER'S ATTORNEY
The seller's attorney should provide the seller with a written Fee Agreement in accordance with the requirements of the Rules of Professional Conduct. Please do not be put off by the formality of this letter as it is for your protection as a consumer of legal services.
Legal fees for sales vary. We still charge a flat rate of $800 plus any costs for a simple real estate house sale where the realtor prepares the contract.
We anticipate the following will be performed by your attorney in a real estate sale:
1. Review and analyze the contract of sale during attorney review after both buyer and seller sign the contract.
2. Recommend revisions to contract if needed. However, the seller should never sign the contract if it is missing clauses or language needed by the seller.
3. Initial Office consultation if requested with client after contract is signed by both buyer and seller;
4. Request from the Seller back title, including a photocopy of the Deed, survey, title policy and mortgage payoff statement.
5. Preparation of fax letter of representation to buyer's attorney
6. Opening of file
7. Prepare Representation statement to client with request for Seller's Information Sheet
8. Review old Deed, survey
9. Forward Deed, survey, title policy to the purchaser's attorney, thus expediting the search and survey process.
10. Three (3) free calls with client
11. Three (3) telephone calls with buyers attorney and other individuals
12. Three (3) correspondence to and from buyers attorney and clients
13. Review home inspection report
14. Review other documents supplied by client and buyer's attorney;
15. Work with the purchaser's attorney in resolving possession and closing date.
16. Remind the seller to contact their mortgage company and equity loan to obtain a written payoff/ balance due on their mortgage.
17. Review Title Binder and Judgment Searches, if applicable
18. Review RESPA pre-closing, if applicable
19. Preparation of Deed, fax to buyer's attorney
20. Preparation of Affidavit of Title, fax to buyer's attorney
21. Cooperate with the purchaser's attorney in preparing the final closing statement.
22. Review the Respa, which is the Federal Real Estate Settlement Procedure Statement/ Amounts paid and to be received
23. Represent you at the closing.
24. Attend closing, execute Deed, execute Affidavit of Title
25. Assist in Preparation of 1099 tax form
26. Offer sound legal advice to client;
27. Preparation of End of Case Letter and client questionnaire.
28. Make available to client in office upon request free client case folder, Real Estate brochure, Website brochure, and other information brochures on Wills and Power of Attorney;
29. Free Brochures provided on other legal topics such as Car Insurance Rights, Worker's Comp,
30. Free subscription to monthly e-mail newsletter. Provide your email address.
31. 3 free telephone calls during the 2 years after the closing on Probate, Wills and non real estate matters.
32. Invitation to client community events.
33. Free Magnet, Keychain, Pen upon request in the office
Costs are items such as filing and recording fees, Certified or Express postage and other out of pocket expenses.
This fee does not include costs or legal fees if there are judgments against the property, probate issues, defects in title or other work requested to be performed. If this closing does not take place, you will only be responsible for the legal fees and costs incurred.
Work with your Realtor
Your realtor is a highly trained licensed professional. Their goal is to help you through this closing. They perform substantial work and earn the commissions of between $8,000- $16,000. In order to keep your legal fees down, you should be calling you realtor with routine questions regarding the closing. We have learned by past experience if you, your realtor or you family call your attorney's office every day, these calls are not included in the $800 fee, and there will be a charge for excess calls. The buyer is entitled to obtain a termite inspection and home inspection. Inspections are scheduled by the realtors. If the buyer requests repairs after the home inspection report is done, speak with your realtor first.
The seller is responsible for obtaining the smoke detector certificate, plus municipal certificate of occupancy if required by your town. Discuss these with your realtor. Please also arrange the walk through with your realtor.
Closing date is approximate
You should understand that the proposed closing date in the Contract is an approximate closing date. The actual closing depends upon the buyer's mortgage company issuing a commitment and a mortgage check. We do not set the closing date, that is set by the buyer's attorney. The realtor should be calling the buyer's attorney to determine time of closing and directions to the closing, not our office.
If Seller fails to timely obtain a written mortgage payoff statement, there will be an additional charge of $100.00 for the Seller's attorney to obtain the written payoff statement.
SELLERS INFORMATION SHEET- To be filled out by seller and returned to seller's attorney
KENNETH VERCAMMEN & ASSOCIATES, PC
1. SELLERS NAME: (as it appears on deed)
___________________________________________________________
2. Real Estate being Sold: Lot No. _________ Block No. __________
Address: __________________________________________
3. Present Mortgage Company: _____________________________
Address: ___________________________________________
Loan No. ___________________ 800 Telephone No. ____________
(Provide copy of payoff amount)
4. Other Mortgages, including Bridge Loans or Home Equity:
Name of Mortgage Company: _____________________________
Address: __________________________________________
Loan No. __________________ 800 Telephone No. ____________
(Obtain written copy of payoff amount from bank, a verbal payoff will not be good enough)
5. Social Security Number: (H) ________________ (W) ___________
6. Is any Seller age 62 or over? If so, name and date of birth: _________
7. Name, Address, Telephone number of Condominium Association, if any
_______________________________________________________
8. Type of Fuel: Gas ___________________ Oil _______________
PLEASE ATTACH A COPY OF TITLE INSURANCE, SURVEY, & DEED (not original)
9. Marriage Information:
Date of Marriage __________ Maiden or Prior Name(s) __________
Prior Marriages ________________________
(copy of Final Judgment of Divorce needed, not original)
10. Address After Property Sale: _____________________________
2. Yearly Insurance Review
By Ray Pavese & Mike McCormick
Every year you should review your insurance policies to make sure you still have a policy that
meets your needs, as well as the needs of your family members and
loved ones.
One of the policies that most often gets overlooked is the life
insurance policy. Since this is often a long-term policy, most
insured individuals assume they are stuck with the same policy,
no matter what. Usually this is not the case, although it will
depend on your policy and company as to whether you receive
penalties when changing your insurance.
Even if penalties occur, changing your life insurance policy may
be essential to keeping up with your family's financial needs for
the future.
If you don't review your life insurance policy every year, you
should at least review your policy under these circumstances:
* Marriage/Divorce - Needs change depending on your marital
status. Keep this in mind as things change in your life. Even if
you don't want to change the value of your policy, you probably
want to change the beneficiary.
* Children - If you ask the majority of life insurance agents,
the major reason for changing a life insurance policy is because
of children. This is because many adults never believe they will
need extra money after death until they realize that they will
have someone preceding them in death. Children will need money
for basic food and shelter until they are 18 and possibly for a
future college fund as well. Keep that in mind, and tell others
you know that may be affected.
* An Illness - Although waiting to change your insurance policy
until you have a long-term illness will mean paying higher
premiums, it is best to at least review your policy limitations
and make necessary changes if you find out you have a potentially
life threatening illness.
If you have questions regarding a change you would like to make
on your life insurance policy, feel free to contact me anytime.
Sincerely,
Ray Pavese & Mike McCormick
Pavese-McCormick Agency, Inc.
mikem@pavesemccormick.com
______________________________
3 DWI suppression affirmed where reasons for ordering sobriety test not "reasonable suspicion." State v. Lord Appellate Division, A-3228-05T2, October 5, 2006, not approved for publication.
Law Division order granting the defendant’s motion to suppress evidence of the results of his sobriety tests affirmed; the police officer observed the defendant’s car cross both the shoulder and center lines, and he then activated his video recorder and followed the defendant’s car for about two and a half minutes; the officer testified that, during that time, the defendant came to a full stop several times, properly used his signals when executing turns, did not speed, and properly stopped his car when the officer signaled; there was no question that the initial motor vehicle violation allowed the officer to stop the defendant; however, the Law Division properly concluded that the reasons that the officer gave for ordering sobriety tests did not give rise to a “reasonable suspicion” that the defendant had been driving while intoxicated; although the defendant had been observed violating the motor vehicle laws, his behavior did not demonstrate any further violation, and he did not exhibit any physical impairment. Source: Facts-on-Call Order No. 20296
4. Defendant can be guilty of .08 DWI even though Breath machine calibrated at .10 level. State v. Pearson Appellate Division, A-1344-05T2, September 22, 2006, not approved for publication.
Conviction following a trial de novo of driving while intoxicated affirmed; the defendant registered blood-alcohol-content levels of 0.08 and 0.09 on two Breathalyzer tests; the defendant asserted that the State had not established that the Breathalyzer was in proper working order because it was calibrated for accuracy at a 0.10 blood-alcohol-content level rather than a 0.08 level; the State Police protocols were not changed when N.J.S.A. 39:4-50 was amended to reduce the blood-alcohol-content level needed to establish a per se violation from 0.10 to 0.08, and the protocols require periodic testing with a simulator solution to establish accuracy at the 0.10 level; there was no merit to the defendant’s argument in light of the well-established principle that a Breathalyzer that is tested pursuant to the protocols and satisfies them is in proper working order and thus satisfies the State’s burden of proving that the results from the Breathalyzer, if correctly operated by a qualified operator, are reliable. Source: Facts-on-Call Order No. 20227
_____________________________
Our law blog- http://njlaws1.blogspot.com/
Thank you for reading our newsletter! God Bless America USA #1
We appreciate continued referrals. We want to take the time to extend to our friends and clients our sincere gratitude because it is good friends and clients that make our business grow. Client recommendation is a very important source of new clients to us. We are grateful for the recommendation of new clients. We will do our best to give all clients excellent care. We shall do our best to justify all recommendations.
"Celebrating more than 21 years of providing excellent service to clients 1985-2007" Former Prosecutor
This newsletter is produced to be sent electronically. If you know someone who would also like to receive this email newsletter, please have them email us at newsletter@njlaws.com.
Free T- shirts and soda can holders available for all current and past clients. Please come into office.
Editor's Note and Disclaimer: All materials Copyright 2007. You may pass along the information on the NJ Laws Newsletter and website, provided the name and address of the Law Office is included.
KENNETH VERCAMMEN & ASSOCIATES, PC
ATTORNEY AT LAW
2053 Woodbridge Ave.
Edison, NJ 08817
(Phone) 732-572-0500
(Fax) 732-572-0030
website: www.njlaws.com
Admitted to practice law in New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, US Supreme Court and Federal District Court
April 25, 2007
In this issue:
1. Real Estate Sales
2. Yearly Insurance Review
3 DWI suppression affirmed where reasons for ordering sobriety test not "reasonable suspicion."
4. Defendant can be guilty of .08 DWI even though Breath machine calibrated at .10 level
1. Real Estate Sales
To better serve our Probate and Senior citizen clients, Kenneth Vercammen has taken and passed the NJ Real Estate Salesperson test. The examination consists of numerous questions taken over a 4 hour period. Mr. Vercammen is now also a licensed real estate agent, is affiliated with Century 21, John Anthony Agency on 1815 Oak Tree Rd., Edison, NJ. Century 21 is one of the largest real estate agencies in the country. http://www.century21johnanthony.com/
If you will be selling a house, please give Kenneth Vercammen a call. Do not pay a 6% commission, but also don't rely on a 2% agency that merely lists your home on the internet, then expects you to do all the work.
SELLERS INFORMATION SHEET
The sale of a home is probably the largest transaction a person will ever undertake. Careful consideration should be given to the technical difficulties involved in the transfer.
The Contract of Sale
A Contract of Sale is an agreement for the purchase and sale of real estate. This is the most important document in any real estate transaction because it establishes the respective rights and responsibilities of the purchaser and the seller.
Since the Contract of Sale is important and legally binding New Jersey requires a 3 day attorney review period on Contracts prepared by a realtor. Please read the contract before signing. If you have any questions, please ask your real estate agent. If there are any clauses you want added, such as the house sale "As is", make sure they are added to the Contract before signing.
The 3 day attorney review period is to protect the buyer and seller from being forever bound by a contract without them receiving the benefit of legal advice. You only have three days to have your attorney review the contract and make the appropriate changes. Remember that once a Contract is signed and in final form after 3 days, your rights and obligations are fixed concerning the transaction. Your attorney will no longer have the opportunity to structure the Contract to meet your objectives.
Read and Understand the Contract Before Signing your Contract of Sale
Perhaps the seller may want to retain possession of the property for some time in order to find new accommodations. You should make sure these clauses are included in the contract defining such rights prior to signing. Never sign a contract involving the sale or purchase of real estate until you have done the following:
1. read the entire contract
2. written down your questions and posed them to your realtor
3. made sure all your requested clauses are included, such as the house being sold "as is"
These are only a few matters usually covered in the contract. However, they illustrate the variety of terms and conditions to be considered when you enter into such a transaction.
FEE AGREEMENT BY THE SELLER'S ATTORNEY
The seller's attorney should provide the seller with a written Fee Agreement in accordance with the requirements of the Rules of Professional Conduct. Please do not be put off by the formality of this letter as it is for your protection as a consumer of legal services.
Legal fees for sales vary. We still charge a flat rate of $800 plus any costs for a simple real estate house sale where the realtor prepares the contract.
We anticipate the following will be performed by your attorney in a real estate sale:
1. Review and analyze the contract of sale during attorney review after both buyer and seller sign the contract.
2. Recommend revisions to contract if needed. However, the seller should never sign the contract if it is missing clauses or language needed by the seller.
3. Initial Office consultation if requested with client after contract is signed by both buyer and seller;
4. Request from the Seller back title, including a photocopy of the Deed, survey, title policy and mortgage payoff statement.
5. Preparation of fax letter of representation to buyer's attorney
6. Opening of file
7. Prepare Representation statement to client with request for Seller's Information Sheet
8. Review old Deed, survey
9. Forward Deed, survey, title policy to the purchaser's attorney, thus expediting the search and survey process.
10. Three (3) free calls with client
11. Three (3) telephone calls with buyers attorney and other individuals
12. Three (3) correspondence to and from buyers attorney and clients
13. Review home inspection report
14. Review other documents supplied by client and buyer's attorney;
15. Work with the purchaser's attorney in resolving possession and closing date.
16. Remind the seller to contact their mortgage company and equity loan to obtain a written payoff/ balance due on their mortgage.
17. Review Title Binder and Judgment Searches, if applicable
18. Review RESPA pre-closing, if applicable
19. Preparation of Deed, fax to buyer's attorney
20. Preparation of Affidavit of Title, fax to buyer's attorney
21. Cooperate with the purchaser's attorney in preparing the final closing statement.
22. Review the Respa, which is the Federal Real Estate Settlement Procedure Statement/ Amounts paid and to be received
23. Represent you at the closing.
24. Attend closing, execute Deed, execute Affidavit of Title
25. Assist in Preparation of 1099 tax form
26. Offer sound legal advice to client;
27. Preparation of End of Case Letter and client questionnaire.
28. Make available to client in office upon request free client case folder, Real Estate brochure, Website brochure, and other information brochures on Wills and Power of Attorney;
29. Free Brochures provided on other legal topics such as Car Insurance Rights, Worker's Comp,
30. Free subscription to monthly e-mail newsletter. Provide your email address.
31. 3 free telephone calls during the 2 years after the closing on Probate, Wills and non real estate matters.
32. Invitation to client community events.
33. Free Magnet, Keychain, Pen upon request in the office
Costs are items such as filing and recording fees, Certified or Express postage and other out of pocket expenses.
This fee does not include costs or legal fees if there are judgments against the property, probate issues, defects in title or other work requested to be performed. If this closing does not take place, you will only be responsible for the legal fees and costs incurred.
Work with your Realtor
Your realtor is a highly trained licensed professional. Their goal is to help you through this closing. They perform substantial work and earn the commissions of between $8,000- $16,000. In order to keep your legal fees down, you should be calling you realtor with routine questions regarding the closing. We have learned by past experience if you, your realtor or you family call your attorney's office every day, these calls are not included in the $800 fee, and there will be a charge for excess calls. The buyer is entitled to obtain a termite inspection and home inspection. Inspections are scheduled by the realtors. If the buyer requests repairs after the home inspection report is done, speak with your realtor first.
The seller is responsible for obtaining the smoke detector certificate, plus municipal certificate of occupancy if required by your town. Discuss these with your realtor. Please also arrange the walk through with your realtor.
Closing date is approximate
You should understand that the proposed closing date in the Contract is an approximate closing date. The actual closing depends upon the buyer's mortgage company issuing a commitment and a mortgage check. We do not set the closing date, that is set by the buyer's attorney. The realtor should be calling the buyer's attorney to determine time of closing and directions to the closing, not our office.
If Seller fails to timely obtain a written mortgage payoff statement, there will be an additional charge of $100.00 for the Seller's attorney to obtain the written payoff statement.
SELLERS INFORMATION SHEET- To be filled out by seller and returned to seller's attorney
KENNETH VERCAMMEN & ASSOCIATES, PC
1. SELLERS NAME: (as it appears on deed)
___________________________________________________________
2. Real Estate being Sold: Lot No. _________ Block No. __________
Address: __________________________________________
3. Present Mortgage Company: _____________________________
Address: ___________________________________________
Loan No. ___________________ 800 Telephone No. ____________
(Provide copy of payoff amount)
4. Other Mortgages, including Bridge Loans or Home Equity:
Name of Mortgage Company: _____________________________
Address: __________________________________________
Loan No. __________________ 800 Telephone No. ____________
(Obtain written copy of payoff amount from bank, a verbal payoff will not be good enough)
5. Social Security Number: (H) ________________ (W) ___________
6. Is any Seller age 62 or over? If so, name and date of birth: _________
7. Name, Address, Telephone number of Condominium Association, if any
_______________________________________________________
8. Type of Fuel: Gas ___________________ Oil _______________
PLEASE ATTACH A COPY OF TITLE INSURANCE, SURVEY, & DEED (not original)
9. Marriage Information:
Date of Marriage __________ Maiden or Prior Name(s) __________
Prior Marriages ________________________
(copy of Final Judgment of Divorce needed, not original)
10. Address After Property Sale: _____________________________
2. Yearly Insurance Review
By Ray Pavese & Mike McCormick
Every year you should review your insurance policies to make sure you still have a policy that
meets your needs, as well as the needs of your family members and
loved ones.
One of the policies that most often gets overlooked is the life
insurance policy. Since this is often a long-term policy, most
insured individuals assume they are stuck with the same policy,
no matter what. Usually this is not the case, although it will
depend on your policy and company as to whether you receive
penalties when changing your insurance.
Even if penalties occur, changing your life insurance policy may
be essential to keeping up with your family's financial needs for
the future.
If you don't review your life insurance policy every year, you
should at least review your policy under these circumstances:
* Marriage/Divorce - Needs change depending on your marital
status. Keep this in mind as things change in your life. Even if
you don't want to change the value of your policy, you probably
want to change the beneficiary.
* Children - If you ask the majority of life insurance agents,
the major reason for changing a life insurance policy is because
of children. This is because many adults never believe they will
need extra money after death until they realize that they will
have someone preceding them in death. Children will need money
for basic food and shelter until they are 18 and possibly for a
future college fund as well. Keep that in mind, and tell others
you know that may be affected.
* An Illness - Although waiting to change your insurance policy
until you have a long-term illness will mean paying higher
premiums, it is best to at least review your policy limitations
and make necessary changes if you find out you have a potentially
life threatening illness.
If you have questions regarding a change you would like to make
on your life insurance policy, feel free to contact me anytime.
Sincerely,
Ray Pavese & Mike McCormick
Pavese-McCormick Agency, Inc.
mikem@pavesemccormick.com
______________________________
3 DWI suppression affirmed where reasons for ordering sobriety test not "reasonable suspicion." State v. Lord Appellate Division, A-3228-05T2, October 5, 2006, not approved for publication.
Law Division order granting the defendant’s motion to suppress evidence of the results of his sobriety tests affirmed; the police officer observed the defendant’s car cross both the shoulder and center lines, and he then activated his video recorder and followed the defendant’s car for about two and a half minutes; the officer testified that, during that time, the defendant came to a full stop several times, properly used his signals when executing turns, did not speed, and properly stopped his car when the officer signaled; there was no question that the initial motor vehicle violation allowed the officer to stop the defendant; however, the Law Division properly concluded that the reasons that the officer gave for ordering sobriety tests did not give rise to a “reasonable suspicion” that the defendant had been driving while intoxicated; although the defendant had been observed violating the motor vehicle laws, his behavior did not demonstrate any further violation, and he did not exhibit any physical impairment. Source: Facts-on-Call Order No. 20296
4. Defendant can be guilty of .08 DWI even though Breath machine calibrated at .10 level. State v. Pearson Appellate Division, A-1344-05T2, September 22, 2006, not approved for publication.
Conviction following a trial de novo of driving while intoxicated affirmed; the defendant registered blood-alcohol-content levels of 0.08 and 0.09 on two Breathalyzer tests; the defendant asserted that the State had not established that the Breathalyzer was in proper working order because it was calibrated for accuracy at a 0.10 blood-alcohol-content level rather than a 0.08 level; the State Police protocols were not changed when N.J.S.A. 39:4-50 was amended to reduce the blood-alcohol-content level needed to establish a per se violation from 0.10 to 0.08, and the protocols require periodic testing with a simulator solution to establish accuracy at the 0.10 level; there was no merit to the defendant’s argument in light of the well-established principle that a Breathalyzer that is tested pursuant to the protocols and satisfies them is in proper working order and thus satisfies the State’s burden of proving that the results from the Breathalyzer, if correctly operated by a qualified operator, are reliable. Source: Facts-on-Call Order No. 20227
_____________________________
Our law blog- http://njlaws1.blogspot.com/
Thank you for reading our newsletter! God Bless America USA #1
We appreciate continued referrals. We want to take the time to extend to our friends and clients our sincere gratitude because it is good friends and clients that make our business grow. Client recommendation is a very important source of new clients to us. We are grateful for the recommendation of new clients. We will do our best to give all clients excellent care. We shall do our best to justify all recommendations.
"Celebrating more than 21 years of providing excellent service to clients 1985-2007" Former Prosecutor
This newsletter is produced to be sent electronically. If you know someone who would also like to receive this email newsletter, please have them email us at newsletter@njlaws.com.
Free T- shirts and soda can holders available for all current and past clients. Please come into office.
Editor's Note and Disclaimer: All materials Copyright 2007. You may pass along the information on the NJ Laws Newsletter and website, provided the name and address of the Law Office is included.
KENNETH VERCAMMEN & ASSOCIATES, PC
ATTORNEY AT LAW
2053 Woodbridge Ave.
Edison, NJ 08817
(Phone) 732-572-0500
(Fax) 732-572-0030
website: www.njlaws.com
Admitted to practice law in New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, US Supreme Court and Federal District Court
NJ Laws Newsletter E241 April 12, 2007
Kenneth Vercammen's NJ Laws email newsletter E241
April 12, 2007
In this issue:
1 Nurse may be required to testify in DWI
2. Customer not guilty of shoplifting if billing dispute
3. Eden 5k Running Race April 15, 2007
4. NUTS & BOLTS OF ELDER LAW Monday, April 23, 2007
1 Nurse may be required to testify in DWI
State of New Jersey v. Robert C. Renshaw A-0712-05T1 02-09-07
The Court that the admission in evidence of the Uniform Certification for Bodily Specimens Taken in a Medically Acceptable Manner, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2A: 62A-11, without the opportunity for cross-examination of the nurse who drew the blood, and over the objection of defendant, runs afoul of the right of confrontation protected both by the United States and the New Jersey Constitutions.
2. Customer not guilty of shoplifting if billing dispute
State of New Jersey v. Adam Goodmann A-1447-05T1
02-02-07
The court held that a customer who, following a billing dispute with Walgreens regarding the cost of photo processing, takes the finished photographs without paying for them, but gives his name and address to the store manager, cannot be found guilty of shoplifting. Photo processing constitutes a service, and therefore, Walgreens was not acting as a "merchant" when it contracted to develop the customer's film. Further, the photographs that Walgreens produced were not "merchandise," because they lacked value to anyone other the customer and were not salable.
The court also held that a customer, engaged in a billing dispute, who left contact information so that the dispute could be settled, cannot be found to have "purposely" taken possession of the "merchandise" with the intention of converting the same to his own use without "paying to the merchant the full retail value thereof."
3. Eden 5k Running Race April 15, 2007
Sunday (rain or shine)
5K: 9:00 AM Start
USATF-NJ Grand Prix Event (500 points)
Princeton Forrestal Village
Rt. 1 & College Rd W,
100 College Rd E
Princeton, NJ 08540-6613
* Food and refreshments
* Awards to 5K age-category and group team winners: 1st, 2nd and 3rd place
JOIN THE CHAMPION RVRR/KEN VERCAMMEN TEAM!
New runners and slower runners invited. Maximum number of runners per team- 21. when
* Relatively flat course
* T-Shirts (while they last)
* Water stops
* Group teams comprised of at least 4 participants welcome *
* Walkers and families welcome!
* Baldasari and Leestma timers
* USATF Certified Course, Sanction Race; USATF-NJ Grand Prix Event (500 points)
RACE HOTLINE: 609.631.9211 or fennelly@fennelly.com (Jerry Fennelly)
http://www.raceforum.com/04/eden.pdf
Photo of Ken Vercammen/ RVRR Championship team
4. NUTS & BOLTS OF ELDER LAW Monday, April 23, 2007
Ideal for attorneys, accountants, financial planners and other professionals
A basic introduction to elder law, from wills, powers of attorney and living trusts, to tax considerations, estate administration, and long-term care insurance - featuring sample forms, documents, and checklists!
Presented in cooperation with the NJSBA Elder & Disability Law Section
and NJSBA Young Lawyers Section
Ideal for attorneys, accountants, financial planners and other professionals
Monday, April 23, 2007
5:30 PM to 9:30 PM
Hilton Garden Inn, Edison / S578i-13166
http://www.njicle.com/seminar.aspx?sid=234
Elder law continues to offer the legal profession a booming opportunity for growth. As your current clients continue to grow older, you need to position yourself to be able to offer them and their families the legal services required by the elderly in todayÕs society.
This practical program is designed to provide the nuts and bolts of elder law practice to general practitioners and young lawyers, as well as to more experienced lawyers seeking to expand into this field. A highly authoritative and experienced panel of elder law attorneys will share proven techniques and experience it would take you years to gather on your own. YouÕll also gain insight on how Federal Medicaid Reform will impact your practice. Register today!
EVERYTHING YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT ELDER LAW, INCLUDING...
¥ Why Have a Will?
Gathering information; standard provisions; designation of fiduciaries; protective clauses; sample forms
¥ Powers of Attorney
Types of POAs; what should be included; why clients need them; POAs and Living Wills; sample forms
¥ Living Trusts (Revocable/Irrevocable) as an Estate Planning Tool
Why it should be used; disadvantages; revocable vs. irrevocable; Insurance Trusts; sample forms
¥ Basic Tax Considerations
Jointly-held property; ÒI love youÓ Will; no Will at all; insurance owned by client; unlimited marital
deduction; estate planning in the testamentary document; sample forms/letters
¥ Estate Administration
Probate process; duties of executor/fiduciary; gathering of assets; tax returns; tax waivers; access to property; sample forms/checklists
¥ Medicaid Planning in Light of Federal Medicaid Reform
Countable assets of Medicaid applicant; income cap/Medical needy standard; look-back period; transfers of property; personal residence; Medicaid estate recovery rules
¥ Fair Hearing
¥ Long Term Care Insurance/Asset Protection
Limitations on coverage; exclusions; premium costs; inflation riders; pre-existing conditions; alternatives to nursing home care
¥ Guardianship
Sponsored by New Jersey Institute for Continuing Legal Education
The non-profit continuing education service of:
The New Jersey State Bar Association
, Rutgers - The State University of New Jersey,
Seton Hall University
One Constitution Square, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08901-1520
For costs and registration information, call
Phone: (732)214-8500
Fax: (732)249-0383 ¥ CustomerService@njicle.com ¥
_____________________________
Our law blog- http://njlaws1.blogspot.com/
Thank you for reading our newsletter! God Bless America USA #1
We appreciate continued referrals. We want to take the time to extend to our friends and clients our sincere gratitude because it is good friends and clients that make our business grow. Client recommendation is a very important source of new clients to us. We are grateful for the recommendation of new clients. We will do our best to give all clients excellent care. We shall do our best to justify all recommendations.
"Celebrating more than 21 years of providing excellent service to clients 1985-2007" Former Prosecutor
This newsletter is produced to be sent electronically. If you know someone who would also like to receive this email newsletter, please have them email us at newsletter@njlaws.com.
Free T- shirts and soda can holders available for all current and past clients. Please come into office.
Editor's Note and Disclaimer: All materials Copyright 2007. You may pass along the information on the NJ Laws Newsletter and website, provided the name and address of the Law Office is included.
KENNETH VERCAMMEN & ASSOCIATES, PC
ATTORNEY AT LAW
2053 Woodbridge Ave.
Edison, NJ 08817
(Phone) 732-572-0500
(Fax) 732-572-0030
website: www.njlaws.com
Admitted to practice law in New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, US Supreme Court and Federal District Court
Registration info or to purchase book & audiotape
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kenneth Vercammen
2053 Woodbridge Ave.
2053 Woodbridge Ave.
Edison,NJ08817
Phone: 732-572-0500
Fax: 732-572-0500
Web site: http://www.njlaws.com/
E-mail: kenvnjlaws@verizon.net
April 12, 2007
In this issue:
1 Nurse may be required to testify in DWI
2. Customer not guilty of shoplifting if billing dispute
3. Eden 5k Running Race April 15, 2007
4. NUTS & BOLTS OF ELDER LAW Monday, April 23, 2007
1 Nurse may be required to testify in DWI
State of New Jersey v. Robert C. Renshaw A-0712-05T1 02-09-07
The Court that the admission in evidence of the Uniform Certification for Bodily Specimens Taken in a Medically Acceptable Manner, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2A: 62A-11, without the opportunity for cross-examination of the nurse who drew the blood, and over the objection of defendant, runs afoul of the right of confrontation protected both by the United States and the New Jersey Constitutions.
2. Customer not guilty of shoplifting if billing dispute
State of New Jersey v. Adam Goodmann A-1447-05T1
02-02-07
The court held that a customer who, following a billing dispute with Walgreens regarding the cost of photo processing, takes the finished photographs without paying for them, but gives his name and address to the store manager, cannot be found guilty of shoplifting. Photo processing constitutes a service, and therefore, Walgreens was not acting as a "merchant" when it contracted to develop the customer's film. Further, the photographs that Walgreens produced were not "merchandise," because they lacked value to anyone other the customer and were not salable.
The court also held that a customer, engaged in a billing dispute, who left contact information so that the dispute could be settled, cannot be found to have "purposely" taken possession of the "merchandise" with the intention of converting the same to his own use without "paying to the merchant the full retail value thereof."
3. Eden 5k Running Race April 15, 2007
Sunday (rain or shine)
5K: 9:00 AM Start
USATF-NJ Grand Prix Event (500 points)
Princeton Forrestal Village
Rt. 1 & College Rd W,
100 College Rd E
Princeton, NJ 08540-6613
* Food and refreshments
* Awards to 5K age-category and group team winners: 1st, 2nd and 3rd place
JOIN THE CHAMPION RVRR/KEN VERCAMMEN TEAM!
New runners and slower runners invited. Maximum number of runners per team- 21. when
* Relatively flat course
* T-Shirts (while they last)
* Water stops
* Group teams comprised of at least 4 participants welcome *
* Walkers and families welcome!
* Baldasari and Leestma timers
* USATF Certified Course, Sanction Race; USATF-NJ Grand Prix Event (500 points)
RACE HOTLINE: 609.631.9211 or fennelly@fennelly.com (Jerry Fennelly)
http://www.raceforum.com/04/eden.pdf
Photo of Ken Vercammen/ RVRR Championship team
4. NUTS & BOLTS OF ELDER LAW Monday, April 23, 2007
Ideal for attorneys, accountants, financial planners and other professionals
A basic introduction to elder law, from wills, powers of attorney and living trusts, to tax considerations, estate administration, and long-term care insurance - featuring sample forms, documents, and checklists!
Presented in cooperation with the NJSBA Elder & Disability Law Section
and NJSBA Young Lawyers Section
Ideal for attorneys, accountants, financial planners and other professionals
Monday, April 23, 2007
5:30 PM to 9:30 PM
Hilton Garden Inn, Edison / S578i-13166
http://www.njicle.com/seminar.aspx?sid=234
Elder law continues to offer the legal profession a booming opportunity for growth. As your current clients continue to grow older, you need to position yourself to be able to offer them and their families the legal services required by the elderly in todayÕs society.
This practical program is designed to provide the nuts and bolts of elder law practice to general practitioners and young lawyers, as well as to more experienced lawyers seeking to expand into this field. A highly authoritative and experienced panel of elder law attorneys will share proven techniques and experience it would take you years to gather on your own. YouÕll also gain insight on how Federal Medicaid Reform will impact your practice. Register today!
EVERYTHING YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT ELDER LAW, INCLUDING...
¥ Why Have a Will?
Gathering information; standard provisions; designation of fiduciaries; protective clauses; sample forms
¥ Powers of Attorney
Types of POAs; what should be included; why clients need them; POAs and Living Wills; sample forms
¥ Living Trusts (Revocable/Irrevocable) as an Estate Planning Tool
Why it should be used; disadvantages; revocable vs. irrevocable; Insurance Trusts; sample forms
¥ Basic Tax Considerations
Jointly-held property; ÒI love youÓ Will; no Will at all; insurance owned by client; unlimited marital
deduction; estate planning in the testamentary document; sample forms/letters
¥ Estate Administration
Probate process; duties of executor/fiduciary; gathering of assets; tax returns; tax waivers; access to property; sample forms/checklists
¥ Medicaid Planning in Light of Federal Medicaid Reform
Countable assets of Medicaid applicant; income cap/Medical needy standard; look-back period; transfers of property; personal residence; Medicaid estate recovery rules
¥ Fair Hearing
¥ Long Term Care Insurance/Asset Protection
Limitations on coverage; exclusions; premium costs; inflation riders; pre-existing conditions; alternatives to nursing home care
¥ Guardianship
Sponsored by New Jersey Institute for Continuing Legal Education
The non-profit continuing education service of:
The New Jersey State Bar Association
, Rutgers - The State University of New Jersey,
Seton Hall University
One Constitution Square, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08901-1520
For costs and registration information, call
Phone: (732)214-8500
Fax: (732)249-0383 ¥ CustomerService@njicle.com ¥
_____________________________
Our law blog- http://njlaws1.blogspot.com/
Thank you for reading our newsletter! God Bless America USA #1
We appreciate continued referrals. We want to take the time to extend to our friends and clients our sincere gratitude because it is good friends and clients that make our business grow. Client recommendation is a very important source of new clients to us. We are grateful for the recommendation of new clients. We will do our best to give all clients excellent care. We shall do our best to justify all recommendations.
"Celebrating more than 21 years of providing excellent service to clients 1985-2007" Former Prosecutor
This newsletter is produced to be sent electronically. If you know someone who would also like to receive this email newsletter, please have them email us at newsletter@njlaws.com.
Free T- shirts and soda can holders available for all current and past clients. Please come into office.
Editor's Note and Disclaimer: All materials Copyright 2007. You may pass along the information on the NJ Laws Newsletter and website, provided the name and address of the Law Office is included.
KENNETH VERCAMMEN & ASSOCIATES, PC
ATTORNEY AT LAW
2053 Woodbridge Ave.
Edison, NJ 08817
(Phone) 732-572-0500
(Fax) 732-572-0030
website: www.njlaws.com
Admitted to practice law in New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, US Supreme Court and Federal District Court
Registration info or to purchase book & audiotape
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kenneth Vercammen
2053 Woodbridge Ave.
2053 Woodbridge Ave.
Edison,NJ08817
Phone: 732-572-0500
Fax: 732-572-0500
Web site: http://www.njlaws.com/
E-mail: kenvnjlaws@verizon.net
NJ Laws Newsletter E245 May 18, 2007
In this issue:
1. Friday, May 25- The Legends of Belmar Volleyball
2. DNA Testing of Criminals Does Not Violate Constitution
3 DNA Testing of Juvenile Criminals Constitutional
4. Receipt of Nine Checks Not a Criminal Enterprise to Deny PTI
5. Fire Investigators Can Remain on Scene and Seize Items in Plain View
1. Friday, May 25- The Legends of Belmar Volleyball- Join the Greats of Belmar beach- Marty, John C. Billy Ball, Jim Watt, Ken Vercammen & others at D'Jay's, Bar A & other fun spots. Run the Spring Lake 5 at 8:30 am the next morning. Exciting start to Memorial Day and the Summer.
2. DNA Testing of Criminals Does Not Violate Constitution. State v. O’Hagen 189 NJ 140 (2007).
The New Jersey DNA Database and Databank Act of N.J.S.A. 53:1- 20.17-20.28, as amended, does not violate the rights guaranteed by the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution and Article I, Paragraphs 1 and 7 of the New Jersey Constitution.
3 DNA Testing of Juvenile Criminals Constitutional. A.A. v. Attorney General of New Jersey 189 NJ 129 (2007).
DNA test results lawfully obtained pursuant to the New Jersey DNA Database and Databank Act of 1994, N.J.S.A. 53:1-20.17- 20.28, as amended, may be used to solve crimes committed prior to the taking of the DNA test.
4. Receipt of Nine Checks Not a Criminal Enterprise to Deny PTI. State v. Watkins 390 NJ Super. 302 (App. Div. 2007).
In this appeal from a denial of defendant's appeal of his rejection from pre-trial intervention (PTI), The court addressed the meaning of PTI Guideline 3(i)(2), which directs consideration of whether the crime was "part of a continuing criminal business or enterprise". Reviewing the prior cases that have addressed this Guideline, The court concludes that the Prosecutor and the reviewing judge erroneously applied Guideline 3(i)(2) to the facts of this case which involved improper receipt of unemployment checks over a four-month period. Defendant's conduct did not possess the characteristics of a "business" or "enterprise" nor did it persist for a long enough period to be deemed "continuing," as that phrase has been applied in earlier cases. As a result, The court remanded to the Prosecutor for reconsideration of defendant's application without consideration of Guideline 3(i)(2).
5. Fire Investigators Can Remain on Scene and Seize Items in Plain View. State v. Amodio 390 NJ Super 313 (App. Div. 2007).
In this matter, defendant was convicted of passion/provocation manslaughter, felony murder, arson and other offenses arising from the death of his girlfriend and her son in a fire at defendant's home. The court held that: 1) evidence obtained by the police and other officials in the fire-damaged home was properly seized without a warrant because the evidence was found during an investigation into the cause and origin of the fire, which was conducted within a reasonable time after the fire had been extinguished; and 2) the warrantless seizure of defendant's clothes was permissible because those garments had been removed from defendant in order to provide emergency medical assistance.
_____________________________
Our law blog- http://njlaws1.blogspot.com/
Thank you for reading our newsletter! God Bless America USA #1
We appreciate continued referrals. We want to take the time to extend to our friends and clients our sincere gratitude because it is good friends and clients that make our business grow. Client recommendation is a very important source of new clients to us. We are grateful for the recommendation of new clients. We will do our best to give all clients excellent care. We shall do our best to justify all recommendations.
"Celebrating more than 21 years of providing excellent service to clients 1985-2007" Former Prosecutor
This newsletter is produced to be sent electronically. If you know someone who would also like to receive this email newsletter, please have them email us at newsletter@njlaws.com.
Free T- shirts and soda can holders available for all current and past clients. Please come into office.
Editor's Note and Disclaimer: All materials Copyright 2007. You may pass along the information on the NJ Laws Newsletter and website, provided the name and address of the Law Office is included.
KENNETH VERCAMMEN & ASSOCIATES, PC
ATTORNEY AT LAW
2053 Woodbridge Ave.
Edison, NJ 08817
(Phone) 732-572-0500
(Fax) 732-572-0030
website: www.njlaws.com
Admitted to practice law in New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, US Supreme Court and Federal District Court
1. Friday, May 25- The Legends of Belmar Volleyball
2. DNA Testing of Criminals Does Not Violate Constitution
3 DNA Testing of Juvenile Criminals Constitutional
4. Receipt of Nine Checks Not a Criminal Enterprise to Deny PTI
5. Fire Investigators Can Remain on Scene and Seize Items in Plain View
1. Friday, May 25- The Legends of Belmar Volleyball- Join the Greats of Belmar beach- Marty, John C. Billy Ball, Jim Watt, Ken Vercammen & others at D'Jay's, Bar A & other fun spots. Run the Spring Lake 5 at 8:30 am the next morning. Exciting start to Memorial Day and the Summer.
2. DNA Testing of Criminals Does Not Violate Constitution. State v. O’Hagen 189 NJ 140 (2007).
The New Jersey DNA Database and Databank Act of N.J.S.A. 53:1- 20.17-20.28, as amended, does not violate the rights guaranteed by the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution and Article I, Paragraphs 1 and 7 of the New Jersey Constitution.
3 DNA Testing of Juvenile Criminals Constitutional. A.A. v. Attorney General of New Jersey 189 NJ 129 (2007).
DNA test results lawfully obtained pursuant to the New Jersey DNA Database and Databank Act of 1994, N.J.S.A. 53:1-20.17- 20.28, as amended, may be used to solve crimes committed prior to the taking of the DNA test.
4. Receipt of Nine Checks Not a Criminal Enterprise to Deny PTI. State v. Watkins 390 NJ Super. 302 (App. Div. 2007).
In this appeal from a denial of defendant's appeal of his rejection from pre-trial intervention (PTI), The court addressed the meaning of PTI Guideline 3(i)(2), which directs consideration of whether the crime was "part of a continuing criminal business or enterprise". Reviewing the prior cases that have addressed this Guideline, The court concludes that the Prosecutor and the reviewing judge erroneously applied Guideline 3(i)(2) to the facts of this case which involved improper receipt of unemployment checks over a four-month period. Defendant's conduct did not possess the characteristics of a "business" or "enterprise" nor did it persist for a long enough period to be deemed "continuing," as that phrase has been applied in earlier cases. As a result, The court remanded to the Prosecutor for reconsideration of defendant's application without consideration of Guideline 3(i)(2).
5. Fire Investigators Can Remain on Scene and Seize Items in Plain View. State v. Amodio 390 NJ Super 313 (App. Div. 2007).
In this matter, defendant was convicted of passion/provocation manslaughter, felony murder, arson and other offenses arising from the death of his girlfriend and her son in a fire at defendant's home. The court held that: 1) evidence obtained by the police and other officials in the fire-damaged home was properly seized without a warrant because the evidence was found during an investigation into the cause and origin of the fire, which was conducted within a reasonable time after the fire had been extinguished; and 2) the warrantless seizure of defendant's clothes was permissible because those garments had been removed from defendant in order to provide emergency medical assistance.
_____________________________
Our law blog- http://njlaws1.blogspot.com/
Thank you for reading our newsletter! God Bless America USA #1
We appreciate continued referrals. We want to take the time to extend to our friends and clients our sincere gratitude because it is good friends and clients that make our business grow. Client recommendation is a very important source of new clients to us. We are grateful for the recommendation of new clients. We will do our best to give all clients excellent care. We shall do our best to justify all recommendations.
"Celebrating more than 21 years of providing excellent service to clients 1985-2007" Former Prosecutor
This newsletter is produced to be sent electronically. If you know someone who would also like to receive this email newsletter, please have them email us at newsletter@njlaws.com.
Free T- shirts and soda can holders available for all current and past clients. Please come into office.
Editor's Note and Disclaimer: All materials Copyright 2007. You may pass along the information on the NJ Laws Newsletter and website, provided the name and address of the Law Office is included.
KENNETH VERCAMMEN & ASSOCIATES, PC
ATTORNEY AT LAW
2053 Woodbridge Ave.
Edison, NJ 08817
(Phone) 732-572-0500
(Fax) 732-572-0030
website: www.njlaws.com
Admitted to practice law in New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, US Supreme Court and Federal District Court
NJ Laws Newsletter E250 July 19, 2007
In This Issue
_______________
1. Reasons to prepare a Last Will and Testament and Property
2. Pre-arrest silence admissible if defendant testifies. State v. Brown 190 N.J. 144 (2007)
3. Prosecutor can comment on defendant's silence if he testifies. State v. Tucker 190 N.J. 183 (2007)
4. Prosecutor can cross defendant on statement. State v. Elkwisni 190 N.J. 169 (2007)
5. No Atty-Client Privilege in sealed letter to prospective attorney, despite police ruse to obtain same State of Washington v. John Nicholas Athan, ___P.3d___, 2007 WL 1365301 (Wa. Sup. Ct. 2007)
6. Friends of Cynthia Vercammen are invited to her 50th party
Saturday July 28 - 7pm
______________________________________________________________________
1. Reasons to prepare a Last Will and Testament and Property
Owners of real property (land) and personal property (money, furniture, bank accounts, cars, personal effects, etc.) have the privilege to select those who will receive these items upon death. If an owner does not have a Will she/he loses that privilege and the law decides. More importantly, as anyone who has been through it with family or friends, the time and money for probating much more expensive and time consuming without a Will. Changes in one's marital status, financial status and family often will require some changes to an existing Will.
Most Americans spend more time preparing for vacation than for estate planning or emergency. Get your Will done now, before traveling on vacation.
2. Pre-arrest silence admissible if defendant testifies. State v. Brown 190 N.J. 144 (2007)
When there is no governmental compulsion involved, the State may cross-examine a defendant concerning his pre-arrest silence to challenge his self-defense testimony.
3. Prosecutor can comment on defendant's silence if he testifies. State v. Tucker 190 N.J. 183 (2007)
The prosecutor's comments about inconsistencies in Tucker's statements did not constitute an unconstitutional comment on silence.
4. Prosecutor can cross defendant on statement. State v. Elkwisni 190 N.J. 169 (2007)
A prosecutor can cross-examine a defendant concerning inconsistencies between his or her post-Miranda statement to the police and his testimony at trial.
5. No Atty-Client Privilege in sealed letter to prospective attorney, despite police ruse to obtain same State of Washington v. John Nicholas Athan, ___P.3d___, 2007 WL 1365301 (Wa. Sup. Ct. 2007)
Twenty years after the murder of a 13-year-old girl, the Seattle police sent a letter to the lead suspect, posing as a law firm seeking to represent the suspect in a class action involving parking tickets. The suspect signed the enclosure and returned it to the "firm." The police then performed a DNA test on the saliva used to seal the envelope and used this evidence to assist in the successful prosecution of the suspect for second degree murder. On appeal, the Washington Supreme Court held that the saliva was not a "communication" protected by the attorney-client privilege; that the ruse used by the police did not violate the defendant's constitutional rights to privacy or due process; and that the conviction should be upheld.
6. Reminder: Friends of Cynthia Vercammen are invited to her 50th party
Saturday, July 28 - 7pm
D.J. , karaoke, 8 person Hot tub plus Deck and Tiki Bar. 2 Fooz ball tables, ping pong, arcade basketball.
Cynthia's 50th Birthday Party Join the Fun Bunch
LOCATION: South Brunswick NJ at 16 Ireland Brook Dr. near Farrington Lake, off Route 130 and Rt. 522)
Directions: Visit our website at www.njlaws.com or call and we will fax directions
Kenneth Vercammen, Esq. at (732) 572-0500 (Law office) or 732-940-8962 (evening)
Yes, We will be attending the party - fax back to Law Office Fax: (732) 572-0030
Name: _____________________________
E-mail: ____________________________
Thank you for reading our newsletter! God Bless America USA #1
Our law blogs:
Vercammen NJLaw Blog-http://njlaws1.blogspot.com/
NJ Criminal Law Blog - http://njcriminallaw.blogspot.com/
NJ Traffic Law & Municipal Court Blog - http://traffic-law.blogspot.com/
NJ Personal Injury & Civil Law Blog- http://njlawspersonalinjury.blogspot.com/
NJ Elder Law Blog -http://elder-law.blogspot.com/
NJ Drug Law Blog - http://drugarrest.blogspot.com/
We appreciate continued referrals. We want to take the time to extend to our friends and clients our sincere gratitude because it is good friends and clients that make our business grow. Client recommendation is a very important source of new clients to us. We are grateful for the recommendation of new clients. We will do our best to give all clients excellent care. We shall do our best to justify all recommendations.
"Celebrating more than 21 years of providing excellent service to clients 1985-2007" Former Prosecutor
This newsletter is produced to be sent electronically. If you know someone who would also like to receive this email newsletter, please have them email us at newsletter@njlaws.com.
Free T- shirts and soda can holders available for all current and past clients. Please come into office.
Editor's Note and Disclaimer:
All materials Copyright 2007. You may pass along the information on the NJ Laws Newsletter and website, provided the name and address of the Law Office is included.
KENNETH VERCAMMEN & ASSOCIATES, PC
ATTORNEY AT LAW
2053 Woodbridge Ave.
Edison, NJ 08817
(Phone) 732-572-0500
(Fax) 732-572-0030
website: www.njlaws.com
Admitted to practice law in New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, US Supreme Court and Federal District Court
_______________
1. Reasons to prepare a Last Will and Testament and Property
2. Pre-arrest silence admissible if defendant testifies. State v. Brown 190 N.J. 144 (2007)
3. Prosecutor can comment on defendant's silence if he testifies. State v. Tucker 190 N.J. 183 (2007)
4. Prosecutor can cross defendant on statement. State v. Elkwisni 190 N.J. 169 (2007)
5. No Atty-Client Privilege in sealed letter to prospective attorney, despite police ruse to obtain same State of Washington v. John Nicholas Athan, ___P.3d___, 2007 WL 1365301 (Wa. Sup. Ct. 2007)
6. Friends of Cynthia Vercammen are invited to her 50th party
Saturday July 28 - 7pm
______________________________________________________________________
1. Reasons to prepare a Last Will and Testament and Property
Owners of real property (land) and personal property (money, furniture, bank accounts, cars, personal effects, etc.) have the privilege to select those who will receive these items upon death. If an owner does not have a Will she/he loses that privilege and the law decides. More importantly, as anyone who has been through it with family or friends, the time and money for probating much more expensive and time consuming without a Will. Changes in one's marital status, financial status and family often will require some changes to an existing Will.
Most Americans spend more time preparing for vacation than for estate planning or emergency. Get your Will done now, before traveling on vacation.
2. Pre-arrest silence admissible if defendant testifies. State v. Brown 190 N.J. 144 (2007)
When there is no governmental compulsion involved, the State may cross-examine a defendant concerning his pre-arrest silence to challenge his self-defense testimony.
3. Prosecutor can comment on defendant's silence if he testifies. State v. Tucker 190 N.J. 183 (2007)
The prosecutor's comments about inconsistencies in Tucker's statements did not constitute an unconstitutional comment on silence.
4. Prosecutor can cross defendant on statement. State v. Elkwisni 190 N.J. 169 (2007)
A prosecutor can cross-examine a defendant concerning inconsistencies between his or her post-Miranda statement to the police and his testimony at trial.
5. No Atty-Client Privilege in sealed letter to prospective attorney, despite police ruse to obtain same State of Washington v. John Nicholas Athan, ___P.3d___, 2007 WL 1365301 (Wa. Sup. Ct. 2007)
Twenty years after the murder of a 13-year-old girl, the Seattle police sent a letter to the lead suspect, posing as a law firm seeking to represent the suspect in a class action involving parking tickets. The suspect signed the enclosure and returned it to the "firm." The police then performed a DNA test on the saliva used to seal the envelope and used this evidence to assist in the successful prosecution of the suspect for second degree murder. On appeal, the Washington Supreme Court held that the saliva was not a "communication" protected by the attorney-client privilege; that the ruse used by the police did not violate the defendant's constitutional rights to privacy or due process; and that the conviction should be upheld.
6. Reminder: Friends of Cynthia Vercammen are invited to her 50th party
Saturday, July 28 - 7pm
D.J. , karaoke, 8 person Hot tub plus Deck and Tiki Bar. 2 Fooz ball tables, ping pong, arcade basketball.
Cynthia's 50th Birthday Party Join the Fun Bunch
LOCATION: South Brunswick NJ at 16 Ireland Brook Dr. near Farrington Lake, off Route 130 and Rt. 522)
Directions: Visit our website at www.njlaws.com or call and we will fax directions
Kenneth Vercammen, Esq. at (732) 572-0500 (Law office) or 732-940-8962 (evening)
Yes, We will be attending the party - fax back to Law Office Fax: (732) 572-0030
Name: _____________________________
E-mail: ____________________________
Thank you for reading our newsletter! God Bless America USA #1
Our law blogs:
Vercammen NJLaw Blog-http://njlaws1.blogspot.com/
NJ Criminal Law Blog - http://njcriminallaw.blogspot.com/
NJ Traffic Law & Municipal Court Blog - http://traffic-law.blogspot.com/
NJ Personal Injury & Civil Law Blog- http://njlawspersonalinjury.blogspot.com/
NJ Elder Law Blog -http://elder-law.blogspot.com/
NJ Drug Law Blog - http://drugarrest.blogspot.com/
We appreciate continued referrals. We want to take the time to extend to our friends and clients our sincere gratitude because it is good friends and clients that make our business grow. Client recommendation is a very important source of new clients to us. We are grateful for the recommendation of new clients. We will do our best to give all clients excellent care. We shall do our best to justify all recommendations.
"Celebrating more than 21 years of providing excellent service to clients 1985-2007" Former Prosecutor
This newsletter is produced to be sent electronically. If you know someone who would also like to receive this email newsletter, please have them email us at newsletter@njlaws.com.
Free T- shirts and soda can holders available for all current and past clients. Please come into office.
Editor's Note and Disclaimer:
All materials Copyright 2007. You may pass along the information on the NJ Laws Newsletter and website, provided the name and address of the Law Office is included.
KENNETH VERCAMMEN & ASSOCIATES, PC
ATTORNEY AT LAW
2053 Woodbridge Ave.
Edison, NJ 08817
(Phone) 732-572-0500
(Fax) 732-572-0030
website: www.njlaws.com
Admitted to practice law in New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, US Supreme Court and Federal District Court
NJ Laws Newsletter E249 July 10, 2007
In This Issue
_______________
1. Friends of Cynthia Vercammen are invited her 50th party
Saturday July 28 7pm
2. Hearsay rule does not apply to breathalyzer certification
3. Prior refusal to take breathalyzer counts for enhanced penalty.
4. Alibi notice requirement may violate 5th Amendment.
5. Upcoming Charity races
6. New DWI testing machine faces Additional questions by the Court.
Quick Links
WWW.NJLAWS.COM
:: 732-572-0500
Greetings Ken Vercammen,
1. Friends of Cynthia Vercammen are invited her 50th party
Saturday, July 28 - 7pm
D.J. , karaoke, 8 person Hot tub plus Deck and Tiki Bar. 2 Fooz ball tables, ping pong, arcade basketball.
Cynthia's 50th Birthday Party Join the Fun Bunch
LOCATION: South Brunswick NJ at 16 Ireland Brook Dr. near Farrington Lake, off Route 130 and Rt. 522)
Directions: Visit our website at www.njlaws.com or call and we will fax directions
Kenneth Vercammen, Esq. at (732) 572-0500 (Law office) or 732-940-8962 (evening)
Yes, We will be attending the party - fax back to Law Office Fax: (732) 572-0030
Name: _____________________________
E-mail: ____________________________
2. Hearsay rule does not apply to breathalyzer certification. State v. Dorman 393 N.J. Super. 28 (App. Div. 2007)
In this DWI appeal, the court held that notwithstanding the Supreme Court's holding in Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 68-69, 124 S. Ct. 1354, 1374, 158 L. Ed. 2d 177, 203 (2004), a breathalyzer machine certificate of operability offered by the State to meet its burden of proof under State v. Garthe, 1 N.J. 1 (1996), remains admissible as a business record under N.J.R.E. 803(c)(6).
3. Prior refusal to take breathalyzer counts for enhanced penalty. State v. Breslin __ N.J. Super. __ A-6074-05T3 5/9/07
Defendant appealed from a judgment convicting him of refusal to submit a breath sample, N.J.S.A. 39:4-50.2, and the imposition of a two-year suspension of his driving privileges as a second offender, N.J.S.A. 39:4-50.4a. Defendant argued that he should not be considered a second offender under N.J.S.A. 39:4-50.4a because his prior conviction for refusal to submit a breath sample was obtained when the burden of proof required for such a conviction was the preponderance of the evidence standard.
As to defendant's contention that he should not be considered a second offender under N.J.S.A. 39:4-50.4a, the court held that there is no just reason to nullify a prior refusal conviction based upon a lesser burden of proof from being considered in determining a defendant's second-offender status under N.J.S.A. 39:4-50.4a after a second conviction for the same refusal offense based upon the criminal standard of proof.
4. Alibi notice requirement may violate 5th Amendment. State v. Bradshaw 392 N.J. Super. 425 (App. Div. 2007)
The court held that application of the notice of alibi rule, R. 3:12-2, to bar a defendant's own testimony as to his whereabouts at the time of a crime, because of his failure to comply with the Rule, unconstitutionally infringes on defendant's state and federal right to testify, a right emanating from the due process and compulsory process guarantees. The court disagreed with contrary rulings in State v. Francis, 128 N.J. Super. 346 (App. Div. 1974) and State v. Gonzalez, 223 N.J. Super. 377 (App. Div.), certif. denied, 111 N.J. 589 (1988).
5. Upcoming Charity races:
7/14/07 Belmar Five Mile Run 5 mile, 8:30am Belmar NJ 732-571-2162 free food at Bar A after race and reduced price drinks. Play Volleyball at Bar A.
7/22/2007 Jersey State Triathlon USAT Sanctioned Mercer County Park 7/28/07 Ocean Grove Biathlon 2M run, 300 yd swim Ocean Grove fast short event. spend the rest of the day at the beach.
7/24/07 RVRR Summer 5k & kids races in New Brunswick. NEW FOR 2007!Due to continued construction at Donaldson Park (our home for 23 years, RVRR moved the races across the river. The races will begin at the south-center of the Buccleuch
Park near the Senior Center (on Huntington Street), and will be 2 loops of 2.5K each. There will be only one major hill each lap, but the course is accurately measured, and we'll have the usual traffic control, water at the finish line, and awards presented within 30 minutes of the finish.NEW LOCATION!! Buccleuch Park, New Brunswick NJ (Easton Avenue across from St. Peters Hospital http://www.rvrr.org/
7/29/2007 The Staten Island Flat as a PANCAKE Sprint TRI & LUMPY PANCAKE Olympic Distance Tri 1/4 mile swim or 2 mile run, 12 mile bike, 5k run or .93 swim, 24 mile bike, 10k run, 10am Staten Island NY 732-841-2558
7/29/2007 Long Branch Sprint Triathlon Series-2 .5k swim, 9.5 mile bike, 3 mile run 6:45am Long Branch NJ 732-614-6028
8/4/07 Neptune City Day 5k, 8:00 Neptune City
8/5/07 Sea Girt 5K 8:30am Sea Girt
8/11/07 San Francisco Bay 5k
8/18/07 Bradley Beach 5k Bradley Beach
8/25/2007 Saturday Tri/Du the Wildwoods 1/4 mile swim, 11 mile bike, 3.1 mile run or 2 mile run, 11 mile bike, 3.1 mile run , 7:30am North Wildwood NJ 609-374-6495
More events at http://www.njlaws.com/calendar_of_community_events.htm
6. New DWI testing machine faces additional questions by the Court.
For over the past several years, the courts have been faced with the question of whether the new DWI Alcotest 7110 breath testing machine is reliable. The NJ Supreme Court has directed further hearings into this new machine. The following is the State v CHUN TIMETABLE
IF NO TESTIMONIAL HEARINGS OF EXPERTS:
5/22/07 Amended Remand Orde
5/30/07 Source Codes due to respective software houses
(7 days from May 23)
8/28/07 Software Houses' reports due to Special Master
(90 days from receipt of source codes 5/31/07)
9/11/07 Special Master's report due to Supreme Court
(14 days from receipt of experts' reports)
IF TESTIMONIAL HEARINGS ARE HELD:
5/22/07 Amended Remand Order
5/30/07 Source Codes due to respective software houses
(7 days from May 23)
8/28/07 Software Houses' reports due to Special Master
(90 days from receipt of source codes 5/31/07)
10/12/07 Testimonial hearings to be completed
(45 days of receipt of experts' report)
10/26/07 Special Master's report due to Supreme Court
(14 days from conclusion of hearings)
After over two years of litigation in State v. Chun, approximately 21,000 pages of documents have been disclosed, a 41 day hearing has been held before Judge King spanning 8,500 pages of transcripts, Judge King issued a 268 page opinion, and the case has been briefed and argued before the Supreme Court. Ultimately, the Supreme Court ordered Dräger, the Alcotest manufacturer, to provide the software (source code) employed in the Alcotest, so that a defense selected software house can evaluate the source code to identify possible errors.
This was a hard fought battle for the defense attorneys. The defense attorneys have collectively expended in excess of six thousand uncompensated billing hours. They also have collectively spent in excess of $50,000 for experts, transcripts, brief printing, etc.
The Defense has retained a software expert, at its own expense, who tells them that based on industry averages and his vast experience, an analysis of the source code by a software house will likely produce numerous programming errors as well as the reasonable possibility that the readings may not be accurate for various programming shortcuts used in analyzing the breath samples.
Even Microsoft routinely sends out patches for its programs as it recognizes glitches in the programs. The Alcotest is produced by a small breath testing company that admitted during the hearing that it uses the same type of microprocessor chip that was used more than 15 years ago in video games.
The volunteer defense attorneys have requested that other defense Attorneys and anyone interested in the making sure this new machine is accurately tested to please contribute to the cost of the source code review and ask your affected clients to do the same. Such contributions will be used solely to fund the source code evaluation, and will not be used for any costs that have been already incurred. Municipal Court Attorneys and individuals interested in the "Innocent until proven Guilty" constitutional guarantee may be interested in making a small contribution. Please make any checks payable to the defense selected software house, "Base One Technologies", and please send them to:
SAMUEL LOUIS SACHS
Princeton Windsor Office Park
379 Princeton-Hightstown Road
P.O. Box 968
East Windsor, NJ 08520
(609) 448-2700
Fax: (609) 448-8883
If you would like to learn more about Base One, please visit their website at www.base-one.com.
Thank you for reading our newsletter! God Bless America USA #1
Our law blogs:
Vercammen NJLaw Blog-http://njlaws1.blogspot.com/
NJ Criminal Law Blog - http://njcriminallaw.blogspot.com/
NJ Traffic Law & Municipal Court Blog - http://traffic-law.blogspot.com/
NJ Personal Injury & Civil Law Blog- http://njlawspersonalinjury.blogspot.com/
NJ Elder Law Blog -http://elder-law.blogspot.com/
NJ Drug Law Blog - http://drugarrest.blogspot.com/
We appreciate continued referrals. We want to take the time to extend to our friends and clients our sincere gratitude because it is good friends and clients that make our business grow. Client recommendation is a very important source of new clients to us. We are grateful for the recommendation of new clients. We will do our best to give all clients excellent care. We shall do our best to justify all recommendations.
"Celebrating more than 21 years of providing excellent service to clients 1985-2007" Former Prosecutor
This newsletter is produced to be sent electronically. If you know someone who would also like to receive this email newsletter, please have them email us at newsletter@njlaws.com.
Free T- shirts and soda can holders available for all current and past clients. Please come into office.
Editor's Note and Disclaimer:
All materials Copyright 2007. You may pass along the information on the NJ Laws Newsletter and website, provided the name and address of the Law Office is included.
KENNETH VERCAMMEN & ASSOCIATES, PC
ATTORNEY AT LAW
2053 Woodbridge Ave.
Edison, NJ 08817
(Phone) 732-572-0500
(Fax) 732-572-0030
website: www.njlaws.com
Admitted to practice law in New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, US Supreme Court and Federal District Court
_______________
1. Friends of Cynthia Vercammen are invited her 50th party
Saturday July 28 7pm
2. Hearsay rule does not apply to breathalyzer certification
3. Prior refusal to take breathalyzer counts for enhanced penalty.
4. Alibi notice requirement may violate 5th Amendment.
5. Upcoming Charity races
6. New DWI testing machine faces Additional questions by the Court.
Quick Links
WWW.NJLAWS.COM
:: 732-572-0500
Greetings Ken Vercammen,
1. Friends of Cynthia Vercammen are invited her 50th party
Saturday, July 28 - 7pm
D.J. , karaoke, 8 person Hot tub plus Deck and Tiki Bar. 2 Fooz ball tables, ping pong, arcade basketball.
Cynthia's 50th Birthday Party Join the Fun Bunch
LOCATION: South Brunswick NJ at 16 Ireland Brook Dr. near Farrington Lake, off Route 130 and Rt. 522)
Directions: Visit our website at www.njlaws.com or call and we will fax directions
Kenneth Vercammen, Esq. at (732) 572-0500 (Law office) or 732-940-8962 (evening)
Yes, We will be attending the party - fax back to Law Office Fax: (732) 572-0030
Name: _____________________________
E-mail: ____________________________
2. Hearsay rule does not apply to breathalyzer certification. State v. Dorman 393 N.J. Super. 28 (App. Div. 2007)
In this DWI appeal, the court held that notwithstanding the Supreme Court's holding in Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 68-69, 124 S. Ct. 1354, 1374, 158 L. Ed. 2d 177, 203 (2004), a breathalyzer machine certificate of operability offered by the State to meet its burden of proof under State v. Garthe, 1 N.J. 1 (1996), remains admissible as a business record under N.J.R.E. 803(c)(6).
3. Prior refusal to take breathalyzer counts for enhanced penalty. State v. Breslin __ N.J. Super. __ A-6074-05T3 5/9/07
Defendant appealed from a judgment convicting him of refusal to submit a breath sample, N.J.S.A. 39:4-50.2, and the imposition of a two-year suspension of his driving privileges as a second offender, N.J.S.A. 39:4-50.4a. Defendant argued that he should not be considered a second offender under N.J.S.A. 39:4-50.4a because his prior conviction for refusal to submit a breath sample was obtained when the burden of proof required for such a conviction was the preponderance of the evidence standard.
As to defendant's contention that he should not be considered a second offender under N.J.S.A. 39:4-50.4a, the court held that there is no just reason to nullify a prior refusal conviction based upon a lesser burden of proof from being considered in determining a defendant's second-offender status under N.J.S.A. 39:4-50.4a after a second conviction for the same refusal offense based upon the criminal standard of proof.
4. Alibi notice requirement may violate 5th Amendment. State v. Bradshaw 392 N.J. Super. 425 (App. Div. 2007)
The court held that application of the notice of alibi rule, R. 3:12-2, to bar a defendant's own testimony as to his whereabouts at the time of a crime, because of his failure to comply with the Rule, unconstitutionally infringes on defendant's state and federal right to testify, a right emanating from the due process and compulsory process guarantees. The court disagreed with contrary rulings in State v. Francis, 128 N.J. Super. 346 (App. Div. 1974) and State v. Gonzalez, 223 N.J. Super. 377 (App. Div.), certif. denied, 111 N.J. 589 (1988).
5. Upcoming Charity races:
7/14/07 Belmar Five Mile Run 5 mile, 8:30am Belmar NJ 732-571-2162 free food at Bar A after race and reduced price drinks. Play Volleyball at Bar A.
7/22/2007 Jersey State Triathlon USAT Sanctioned Mercer County Park 7/28/07 Ocean Grove Biathlon 2M run, 300 yd swim Ocean Grove fast short event. spend the rest of the day at the beach.
7/24/07 RVRR Summer 5k & kids races in New Brunswick. NEW FOR 2007!Due to continued construction at Donaldson Park (our home for 23 years, RVRR moved the races across the river. The races will begin at the south-center of the Buccleuch
Park near the Senior Center (on Huntington Street), and will be 2 loops of 2.5K each. There will be only one major hill each lap, but the course is accurately measured, and we'll have the usual traffic control, water at the finish line, and awards presented within 30 minutes of the finish.NEW LOCATION!! Buccleuch Park, New Brunswick NJ (Easton Avenue across from St. Peters Hospital http://www.rvrr.org/
7/29/2007 The Staten Island Flat as a PANCAKE Sprint TRI & LUMPY PANCAKE Olympic Distance Tri 1/4 mile swim or 2 mile run, 12 mile bike, 5k run or .93 swim, 24 mile bike, 10k run, 10am Staten Island NY 732-841-2558
7/29/2007 Long Branch Sprint Triathlon Series-2 .5k swim, 9.5 mile bike, 3 mile run 6:45am Long Branch NJ 732-614-6028
8/4/07 Neptune City Day 5k, 8:00 Neptune City
8/5/07 Sea Girt 5K 8:30am Sea Girt
8/11/07 San Francisco Bay 5k
8/18/07 Bradley Beach 5k Bradley Beach
8/25/2007 Saturday Tri/Du the Wildwoods 1/4 mile swim, 11 mile bike, 3.1 mile run or 2 mile run, 11 mile bike, 3.1 mile run , 7:30am North Wildwood NJ 609-374-6495
More events at http://www.njlaws.com/calendar_of_community_events.htm
6. New DWI testing machine faces additional questions by the Court.
For over the past several years, the courts have been faced with the question of whether the new DWI Alcotest 7110 breath testing machine is reliable. The NJ Supreme Court has directed further hearings into this new machine. The following is the State v CHUN TIMETABLE
IF NO TESTIMONIAL HEARINGS OF EXPERTS:
5/22/07 Amended Remand Orde
5/30/07 Source Codes due to respective software houses
(7 days from May 23)
8/28/07 Software Houses' reports due to Special Master
(90 days from receipt of source codes 5/31/07)
9/11/07 Special Master's report due to Supreme Court
(14 days from receipt of experts' reports)
IF TESTIMONIAL HEARINGS ARE HELD:
5/22/07 Amended Remand Order
5/30/07 Source Codes due to respective software houses
(7 days from May 23)
8/28/07 Software Houses' reports due to Special Master
(90 days from receipt of source codes 5/31/07)
10/12/07 Testimonial hearings to be completed
(45 days of receipt of experts' report)
10/26/07 Special Master's report due to Supreme Court
(14 days from conclusion of hearings)
After over two years of litigation in State v. Chun, approximately 21,000 pages of documents have been disclosed, a 41 day hearing has been held before Judge King spanning 8,500 pages of transcripts, Judge King issued a 268 page opinion, and the case has been briefed and argued before the Supreme Court. Ultimately, the Supreme Court ordered Dräger, the Alcotest manufacturer, to provide the software (source code) employed in the Alcotest, so that a defense selected software house can evaluate the source code to identify possible errors.
This was a hard fought battle for the defense attorneys. The defense attorneys have collectively expended in excess of six thousand uncompensated billing hours. They also have collectively spent in excess of $50,000 for experts, transcripts, brief printing, etc.
The Defense has retained a software expert, at its own expense, who tells them that based on industry averages and his vast experience, an analysis of the source code by a software house will likely produce numerous programming errors as well as the reasonable possibility that the readings may not be accurate for various programming shortcuts used in analyzing the breath samples.
Even Microsoft routinely sends out patches for its programs as it recognizes glitches in the programs. The Alcotest is produced by a small breath testing company that admitted during the hearing that it uses the same type of microprocessor chip that was used more than 15 years ago in video games.
The volunteer defense attorneys have requested that other defense Attorneys and anyone interested in the making sure this new machine is accurately tested to please contribute to the cost of the source code review and ask your affected clients to do the same. Such contributions will be used solely to fund the source code evaluation, and will not be used for any costs that have been already incurred. Municipal Court Attorneys and individuals interested in the "Innocent until proven Guilty" constitutional guarantee may be interested in making a small contribution. Please make any checks payable to the defense selected software house, "Base One Technologies", and please send them to:
SAMUEL LOUIS SACHS
Princeton Windsor Office Park
379 Princeton-Hightstown Road
P.O. Box 968
East Windsor, NJ 08520
(609) 448-2700
Fax: (609) 448-8883
If you would like to learn more about Base One, please visit their website at www.base-one.com.
Thank you for reading our newsletter! God Bless America USA #1
Our law blogs:
Vercammen NJLaw Blog-http://njlaws1.blogspot.com/
NJ Criminal Law Blog - http://njcriminallaw.blogspot.com/
NJ Traffic Law & Municipal Court Blog - http://traffic-law.blogspot.com/
NJ Personal Injury & Civil Law Blog- http://njlawspersonalinjury.blogspot.com/
NJ Elder Law Blog -http://elder-law.blogspot.com/
NJ Drug Law Blog - http://drugarrest.blogspot.com/
We appreciate continued referrals. We want to take the time to extend to our friends and clients our sincere gratitude because it is good friends and clients that make our business grow. Client recommendation is a very important source of new clients to us. We are grateful for the recommendation of new clients. We will do our best to give all clients excellent care. We shall do our best to justify all recommendations.
"Celebrating more than 21 years of providing excellent service to clients 1985-2007" Former Prosecutor
This newsletter is produced to be sent electronically. If you know someone who would also like to receive this email newsletter, please have them email us at newsletter@njlaws.com.
Free T- shirts and soda can holders available for all current and past clients. Please come into office.
Editor's Note and Disclaimer:
All materials Copyright 2007. You may pass along the information on the NJ Laws Newsletter and website, provided the name and address of the Law Office is included.
KENNETH VERCAMMEN & ASSOCIATES, PC
ATTORNEY AT LAW
2053 Woodbridge Ave.
Edison, NJ 08817
(Phone) 732-572-0500
(Fax) 732-572-0030
website: www.njlaws.com
Admitted to practice law in New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, US Supreme Court and Federal District Court
NJ Laws Newsletter E219 July 9, 2006
In this issue:
1 Undue Influence as Defense to Will or Power of Attorney
2 Right To Bail If Charged With A Criminal Offense
3. Recent cases: Strip Search Improper. State v Harris
4. new webpages: Disfigurement or permanent injury required in car accident cases where the lawsuit threshold applies
_____________________________________
1 Undue Influence as Defense to Will or Power of Attorney One of the major cases dealing with undue influence was Haynes v. First National State Bank of New Jersey, 87 N.J. 163, 75-76 (1981). Here the Supreme Court held that the burden of proof establishing undue influence shifts to the proponent when a will benefits a person who stood in a confidential relationship to the decedent and there are suspicious circumstances which need explanation. The suspicious circumstances need only be slight. Id. at 176. Moreover, when the evidence is almost entirely in the possession of one party and the evidence points to the proponent as asserting undue influence, a clear and convincing standard may be applied rather than the normal burden of proof of preponderance of the evidence. Id. at 183.
Furthermore, the Haynes analysis was extended to situations in which there is a transfer of property where the beneficiary of the property and an attorney is on one side and the donor on the other. See Oachs v. Stanton, 280 N.J. Super. 478, 483 (App. Div. 1995).
The court in Oachs determined that under circumstances such as these the donee bears the burden of proof to establish the validity of the gift, even in situations in which the donee did not dominate the decedent’s will. Id. at 485. This rule was established to protect a donor from making a decision induced by a confidential relationship the donee possesses with the donor. Id. Again, the burden is a clear and convincing standard. Id.
The Supreme Court in Pascale v. Pascale, 113 N.J. 20, 31 (1998), stated that when a donor makes a gift to a donee that he/she is dependent upon, a presumption arises that the donor did not understand the consequences of his/her act. In these situations the donee must demonstrate that the donor had disinterested and competent counsel. Id. Likewise, undue influence is conclusive, when a mentally or physically weakened donor makes a gift without advice or a means of support, to a donee upon whom he/she depends. Id.
A confidential relationship can be found to exist when one is certain that the parties dealt on unequal terms. In re Stroming’s Will, 12 N.J. Super. 217, 224 (1951). The appropriate inquiry is if a confidential relationship existed, did the parties deal on terms and conditions of equality? Blake v. Brennan, 1 N.J. Super. 446, 453 (1948).
Suspicious circumstances are not required to create a presumption of undue influence with regard to inter vivos gifts and the presumption of undue influence is more easily raised in an inter vivos transfer. See Pascale, supra, 113 N.J. at 31; Bronson v. Bronson, 218 N.J. Super. 389, 394 (App. Div. 1987).
Generally, an adult is presumed to be competent to make an inter vivos gift. See Conners v. Murphy, 100 N.J. Eq. 280, 282 (E. & A. 1926); Pascale v. Pascale, 113 N.J. 20, 29 (1988). However, when a party alleges undue influence with regard to an inter vivos gift, the contesting party must prove undue influence existed or that a presumption of undue influence should arise. Pascale, supra, 113 N.J. at 30.
A presumption of undue influence arises when a confidential relationship exists between the donor and donee or where the contestant proves the donee dominated the Will of the donor. Id.; see also Seylaz v. Bennett, 5 N.J. 168, 172 (1950); In re Dodge, 50 N.J. 192, 227 (1967); Mott v. Mott, 49 N.J. Eq. 192, 198 (Ch. 1891); Oachs v. Stanton, 280 N.J. Super. 478 (App. Div. 1995) (holding that where a confidential relationship existed and that the donor did not rely upon the donee, a shifting of the burden was still appropriate); In re Neuman’s Estate, 133 N.J. Eq. 532, 534-35 (E. & A. 1943) (stating in a will context “Such burden does not shift merely because of the existence of a confidential relationship, without more, as in the matter of gifts inter vivos.”)
The In re Dodge court explained why a presumption of undue influence arises in a confidential relationship and stated: “In the application of this rule it is not necessary that the donee occupy such a dominant position toward the donor as to create an inference that the donor was unable to assert his will in opposition to that of the donee.” In Re Dodge, 50 N.J. 192 (1967). The court referenced a much earlier case in explaining the rule’s application:
"Its purpose is not so much to afford protection to the donor against the consequences of undue influence exercised over him by the donee, as it is to afford him protection against the consequences voluntary action on his part induced by the existence of the relationship between them, the effect of which upon his own interests he may only partially understand or appreciate." In re Dodge, supra, 50 N.J. at 228 citing Slack v. Rees, 66 N.J. Eq. 447, 449 (E. & A. 1904).
In sum, once it is proven that a confidential relationship exists the burden shifts to the donee to show by clear and convincing evidence that no undue influence was used. Although the case law indicates suspicious circumstances need not be shown the donee must show all was fair, open and voluntary, no deception was practiced and that the transaction was well understood. Pascale, supra, 113 N.J. at 31; see also In re Dodge, supra, 50 N.J. at 227; Seylaz, supra, 5 N.J. at 173. Furthermore, confidential relationships arise in all types of relationships “whether legal, natural or conventional in their origin, in which confidence is naturally inspired, or, in fact, reasonably exists.” In re Fulper’s Estate, 99 N.J. Eq. 292, 314 (Prerog. Ct. 1926); see Pascale, supra, 113 N.J. at 34. It appears confidential relationships exist in all cases in which:
"The relations between the [contracting] parties appear to be of such a character as to render it certain that they do not deal on terms of equality, but that either on the one side from superior knowledge of the matter derived from a fiduciary relation, or from over-mastering influence; or on the other from weakness, dependence or trust justifiably reposed, unfair advantage is rendered probable." Pascale, supra, 113 N.J. at 34, quoting In re Fulper, supra, 99 N.J. Eq. at 314; see also In re Dodge, supra, 50 N.J. at 228.
In determining whether the Defendant was the dominant person in the relationship there is no clear cut rule and instead the court must look to the particular circumstances of the matter. In re Fulper, supra, 99 N.J. Eq. at 315; Giacobbi v. Anselmi, 18 N.J. Super. 600, 616 (Ch. Div. 1952). In Fulper the court determined that a confidential relationship existed in a father-son relationship in which the father was advanced in age, weak and physically depended upon the son. Moreover, since the father sought the son’s assistance on business matters, lived with the son during the winter months and gave the son joint and several power over his checking account an actual repose of trust and confidence in the son was demonstrated. In re Fulper, supra, 99 N.J. Eq. at 318.
In the Giacobbi case, supra, a confidential relationship was determined to exist between a mother and daughter, even though the mother did not suffer from mental or physical infirmity. There the mother was found to be alert, active, and somewhat independent. However, she turned to the daughter for small issues and problems when they occurred. Giacobbi, supra, 18 N.J. Super. at 617.
Therefore, the burden can shift to Defendant to prove by clear and convincing evidence the transaction was not unduly influenced. Furthermore, where a donor makes an “improvident” gift to the donee upon whom she depends that strips the donor of all or virtually all their assets, as here, a presumption arises that the donor did not understand the consequences of their act. Pascale, supra, 113 N.J. at 31, citing Vanderbach v. Vollinger, 1 N.J. 481, 489 (1949). Under those circumstances the donee must establish that the donor had the advice of competent and disinterested counsel. Id. citing Vanderback, supra, 1 N.J .at 488-89.
Similarly, when a mentally or physically weakened donor makes a gift to a donee whom the donor is dependent upon, without advice, and the gift leaves the donee without adequate means of support, a conclusive presumption of undue influence arises. Id. citing Seylaz, supra, 5 N.J. at 173. However, when a donor is not dependent upon the donee “independent advice is not a prerequisite to the validity of an improvident gift even though the relationship between the parties is one of trust and confidence.” Id. citing Seylaz, supra, 5 N.J. at 173.
More details at http://www.njlaws.com/Undue-Influence-of-Attorney.htm
___________________
2. Right To Bail If Charged With A Criminal Offense
As set forth in NJ Practice, Vol. 31, Criminal Practice and Procedure, (1997), Sec 292, the defendant has a right to bail before conviction except if he/she is charged with a crime punishable by death and the prosecutor presents proof that there is a likelihood of conviction and reasonable grounds to believe that the death penalty may be imposed. 3 This means that absent exceptional circumstances the defendant has a right to pretrial liberty if the defendant provides surety in such amount as in the judgment of the court will insure the defendant's appearance at trial. 4 Stated in other terms, the right to bail means that in the absence of exceptional circumstances the defendant has the right to have the court set bail in an amount which does not exceed that which will insure defendant's appearance at trial, and if the defendant can "come up" with cash in that amount, or 10 percent of that amount if the defendant is eligible to be released on 10 percent cash bail, or a bond or other surety, then the defendant must be released.
BAIL PROCEDURES
Any person unable to post bail shall have his or her bail reviewed by a Superior Court judge not later than the next day which is neither a Saturday, Sunday or legal holiday. A first motion for a reduction of bail shall be held by the Court no later than 7 days after it is filed.
More details at http://www.geocities.com/kenvnjlaw/bail_rightto.htm
__________________
3. Recent cases: Strip Search Improper. State v Harris 384 N.J. Super. 29 (App Div. 2006)
Police conduct up in the seizure of the baggies from defendant's mouth was lawful, but that the strip search at the police station was unreasonable and lacking in probable cause.
______________________
4. new webpages
Disfigurement or permanent injury required in car accident cases where the lawsuit threshold applies
In order to recover damages in most in a car Personal Injury case, the plaintiff must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that he/she sustained injuries which fit into one or more of the following categories: 1. Death; 2. Dismemberment; 3. Significant disfigurement or significant scarring; 4. Displaced fracture; 5. Loss of a fetus; 6. A permanent injury within a reasonable degree of medical probability, other than scarring or disfigurement.
www.njlaws.com/disfigurement_or_permanent_injury_in_car_accident.htm
New webpage:
Court Rule 5:8. CUSTODY OF CHILDREN
http://www.njlaws.com/custody_of_children.htm
__________________________
Thank You! Thank You!
Thanks to all our clients who graciously referred their family, friends and associates to our agency. We build our firm on your positive comments. We couldn't do it without you!
Referrals are the lifeblood of any business, and there's no better source than you, our clients.
_____________________________
Thank you for reading our newsletter! God Bless America USA #1
Kenneth Vercammen, Esq.
2053 Woodbridge Ave.
Edison, NJ 08817
PHONE 732-572-0500 (Fax) 732-572-0030
website: www.njlaws.com
Speakers Bureau: The NJ State Bar Association established a community Speakers Bureau to provide educational programs to senior clubs, Unions and Middlesex County companies. During the past year, volunteer attorneys have provided Legal Rights Seminars to hundreds of seniors, business owners and their employees, unions, clubs and non-profit groups. If you are interested in having an attorney speak on Wills, Probate or Elder Law at an event, please call my office. These quality daytime educational programs will educate and even entertain. Clubs and companies are invited to schedule a free seminar during business hours.
"Celebrating more than 20 years of providing excellent service to clients 1985-2006" Former Prosecutor
This newsletter is produced to be sent electronically. If you know someone who would also like to receive this email newsletter, please have them email us at newsletter@njlaws.com.
Free T- shirts and car coffee holders to all current and past clients. Please come into office.
Editor's Note and Disclaimer: All materials Copyright 2006. You may pass along the information on the NJ Laws Newsletter and website, provided the name and address of the Law Office is included.
Always schedule an office appointment with an experienced attorney when you have a legal matter. The Rules of Court limit an attorney's ability to discuss matters over the phone. If you have legal questions, you should schedule an in- office consultation.
Removals handled by webmaster lonekeep.com. To remove, email back & type in subject line "remove". Removals are performed by the webmaster Lonekeep once per month.
1 Undue Influence as Defense to Will or Power of Attorney
2 Right To Bail If Charged With A Criminal Offense
3. Recent cases: Strip Search Improper. State v Harris
4. new webpages: Disfigurement or permanent injury required in car accident cases where the lawsuit threshold applies
_____________________________________
1 Undue Influence as Defense to Will or Power of Attorney One of the major cases dealing with undue influence was Haynes v. First National State Bank of New Jersey, 87 N.J. 163, 75-76 (1981). Here the Supreme Court held that the burden of proof establishing undue influence shifts to the proponent when a will benefits a person who stood in a confidential relationship to the decedent and there are suspicious circumstances which need explanation. The suspicious circumstances need only be slight. Id. at 176. Moreover, when the evidence is almost entirely in the possession of one party and the evidence points to the proponent as asserting undue influence, a clear and convincing standard may be applied rather than the normal burden of proof of preponderance of the evidence. Id. at 183.
Furthermore, the Haynes analysis was extended to situations in which there is a transfer of property where the beneficiary of the property and an attorney is on one side and the donor on the other. See Oachs v. Stanton, 280 N.J. Super. 478, 483 (App. Div. 1995).
The court in Oachs determined that under circumstances such as these the donee bears the burden of proof to establish the validity of the gift, even in situations in which the donee did not dominate the decedent’s will. Id. at 485. This rule was established to protect a donor from making a decision induced by a confidential relationship the donee possesses with the donor. Id. Again, the burden is a clear and convincing standard. Id.
The Supreme Court in Pascale v. Pascale, 113 N.J. 20, 31 (1998), stated that when a donor makes a gift to a donee that he/she is dependent upon, a presumption arises that the donor did not understand the consequences of his/her act. In these situations the donee must demonstrate that the donor had disinterested and competent counsel. Id. Likewise, undue influence is conclusive, when a mentally or physically weakened donor makes a gift without advice or a means of support, to a donee upon whom he/she depends. Id.
A confidential relationship can be found to exist when one is certain that the parties dealt on unequal terms. In re Stroming’s Will, 12 N.J. Super. 217, 224 (1951). The appropriate inquiry is if a confidential relationship existed, did the parties deal on terms and conditions of equality? Blake v. Brennan, 1 N.J. Super. 446, 453 (1948).
Suspicious circumstances are not required to create a presumption of undue influence with regard to inter vivos gifts and the presumption of undue influence is more easily raised in an inter vivos transfer. See Pascale, supra, 113 N.J. at 31; Bronson v. Bronson, 218 N.J. Super. 389, 394 (App. Div. 1987).
Generally, an adult is presumed to be competent to make an inter vivos gift. See Conners v. Murphy, 100 N.J. Eq. 280, 282 (E. & A. 1926); Pascale v. Pascale, 113 N.J. 20, 29 (1988). However, when a party alleges undue influence with regard to an inter vivos gift, the contesting party must prove undue influence existed or that a presumption of undue influence should arise. Pascale, supra, 113 N.J. at 30.
A presumption of undue influence arises when a confidential relationship exists between the donor and donee or where the contestant proves the donee dominated the Will of the donor. Id.; see also Seylaz v. Bennett, 5 N.J. 168, 172 (1950); In re Dodge, 50 N.J. 192, 227 (1967); Mott v. Mott, 49 N.J. Eq. 192, 198 (Ch. 1891); Oachs v. Stanton, 280 N.J. Super. 478 (App. Div. 1995) (holding that where a confidential relationship existed and that the donor did not rely upon the donee, a shifting of the burden was still appropriate); In re Neuman’s Estate, 133 N.J. Eq. 532, 534-35 (E. & A. 1943) (stating in a will context “Such burden does not shift merely because of the existence of a confidential relationship, without more, as in the matter of gifts inter vivos.”)
The In re Dodge court explained why a presumption of undue influence arises in a confidential relationship and stated: “In the application of this rule it is not necessary that the donee occupy such a dominant position toward the donor as to create an inference that the donor was unable to assert his will in opposition to that of the donee.” In Re Dodge, 50 N.J. 192 (1967). The court referenced a much earlier case in explaining the rule’s application:
"Its purpose is not so much to afford protection to the donor against the consequences of undue influence exercised over him by the donee, as it is to afford him protection against the consequences voluntary action on his part induced by the existence of the relationship between them, the effect of which upon his own interests he may only partially understand or appreciate." In re Dodge, supra, 50 N.J. at 228 citing Slack v. Rees, 66 N.J. Eq. 447, 449 (E. & A. 1904).
In sum, once it is proven that a confidential relationship exists the burden shifts to the donee to show by clear and convincing evidence that no undue influence was used. Although the case law indicates suspicious circumstances need not be shown the donee must show all was fair, open and voluntary, no deception was practiced and that the transaction was well understood. Pascale, supra, 113 N.J. at 31; see also In re Dodge, supra, 50 N.J. at 227; Seylaz, supra, 5 N.J. at 173. Furthermore, confidential relationships arise in all types of relationships “whether legal, natural or conventional in their origin, in which confidence is naturally inspired, or, in fact, reasonably exists.” In re Fulper’s Estate, 99 N.J. Eq. 292, 314 (Prerog. Ct. 1926); see Pascale, supra, 113 N.J. at 34. It appears confidential relationships exist in all cases in which:
"The relations between the [contracting] parties appear to be of such a character as to render it certain that they do not deal on terms of equality, but that either on the one side from superior knowledge of the matter derived from a fiduciary relation, or from over-mastering influence; or on the other from weakness, dependence or trust justifiably reposed, unfair advantage is rendered probable." Pascale, supra, 113 N.J. at 34, quoting In re Fulper, supra, 99 N.J. Eq. at 314; see also In re Dodge, supra, 50 N.J. at 228.
In determining whether the Defendant was the dominant person in the relationship there is no clear cut rule and instead the court must look to the particular circumstances of the matter. In re Fulper, supra, 99 N.J. Eq. at 315; Giacobbi v. Anselmi, 18 N.J. Super. 600, 616 (Ch. Div. 1952). In Fulper the court determined that a confidential relationship existed in a father-son relationship in which the father was advanced in age, weak and physically depended upon the son. Moreover, since the father sought the son’s assistance on business matters, lived with the son during the winter months and gave the son joint and several power over his checking account an actual repose of trust and confidence in the son was demonstrated. In re Fulper, supra, 99 N.J. Eq. at 318.
In the Giacobbi case, supra, a confidential relationship was determined to exist between a mother and daughter, even though the mother did not suffer from mental or physical infirmity. There the mother was found to be alert, active, and somewhat independent. However, she turned to the daughter for small issues and problems when they occurred. Giacobbi, supra, 18 N.J. Super. at 617.
Therefore, the burden can shift to Defendant to prove by clear and convincing evidence the transaction was not unduly influenced. Furthermore, where a donor makes an “improvident” gift to the donee upon whom she depends that strips the donor of all or virtually all their assets, as here, a presumption arises that the donor did not understand the consequences of their act. Pascale, supra, 113 N.J. at 31, citing Vanderbach v. Vollinger, 1 N.J. 481, 489 (1949). Under those circumstances the donee must establish that the donor had the advice of competent and disinterested counsel. Id. citing Vanderback, supra, 1 N.J .at 488-89.
Similarly, when a mentally or physically weakened donor makes a gift to a donee whom the donor is dependent upon, without advice, and the gift leaves the donee without adequate means of support, a conclusive presumption of undue influence arises. Id. citing Seylaz, supra, 5 N.J. at 173. However, when a donor is not dependent upon the donee “independent advice is not a prerequisite to the validity of an improvident gift even though the relationship between the parties is one of trust and confidence.” Id. citing Seylaz, supra, 5 N.J. at 173.
More details at http://www.njlaws.com/Undue-Influence-of-Attorney.htm
___________________
2. Right To Bail If Charged With A Criminal Offense
As set forth in NJ Practice, Vol. 31, Criminal Practice and Procedure, (1997), Sec 292, the defendant has a right to bail before conviction except if he/she is charged with a crime punishable by death and the prosecutor presents proof that there is a likelihood of conviction and reasonable grounds to believe that the death penalty may be imposed. 3 This means that absent exceptional circumstances the defendant has a right to pretrial liberty if the defendant provides surety in such amount as in the judgment of the court will insure the defendant's appearance at trial. 4 Stated in other terms, the right to bail means that in the absence of exceptional circumstances the defendant has the right to have the court set bail in an amount which does not exceed that which will insure defendant's appearance at trial, and if the defendant can "come up" with cash in that amount, or 10 percent of that amount if the defendant is eligible to be released on 10 percent cash bail, or a bond or other surety, then the defendant must be released.
BAIL PROCEDURES
Any person unable to post bail shall have his or her bail reviewed by a Superior Court judge not later than the next day which is neither a Saturday, Sunday or legal holiday. A first motion for a reduction of bail shall be held by the Court no later than 7 days after it is filed.
More details at http://www.geocities.com/kenvnjlaw/bail_rightto.htm
__________________
3. Recent cases: Strip Search Improper. State v Harris 384 N.J. Super. 29 (App Div. 2006)
Police conduct up in the seizure of the baggies from defendant's mouth was lawful, but that the strip search at the police station was unreasonable and lacking in probable cause.
______________________
4. new webpages
Disfigurement or permanent injury required in car accident cases where the lawsuit threshold applies
In order to recover damages in most in a car Personal Injury case, the plaintiff must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that he/she sustained injuries which fit into one or more of the following categories: 1. Death; 2. Dismemberment; 3. Significant disfigurement or significant scarring; 4. Displaced fracture; 5. Loss of a fetus; 6. A permanent injury within a reasonable degree of medical probability, other than scarring or disfigurement.
www.njlaws.com/disfigurement_or_permanent_injury_in_car_accident.htm
New webpage:
Court Rule 5:8. CUSTODY OF CHILDREN
http://www.njlaws.com/custody_of_children.htm
__________________________
Thank You! Thank You!
Thanks to all our clients who graciously referred their family, friends and associates to our agency. We build our firm on your positive comments. We couldn't do it without you!
Referrals are the lifeblood of any business, and there's no better source than you, our clients.
_____________________________
Thank you for reading our newsletter! God Bless America USA #1
Kenneth Vercammen, Esq.
2053 Woodbridge Ave.
Edison, NJ 08817
PHONE 732-572-0500 (Fax) 732-572-0030
website: www.njlaws.com
Speakers Bureau: The NJ State Bar Association established a community Speakers Bureau to provide educational programs to senior clubs, Unions and Middlesex County companies. During the past year, volunteer attorneys have provided Legal Rights Seminars to hundreds of seniors, business owners and their employees, unions, clubs and non-profit groups. If you are interested in having an attorney speak on Wills, Probate or Elder Law at an event, please call my office. These quality daytime educational programs will educate and even entertain. Clubs and companies are invited to schedule a free seminar during business hours.
"Celebrating more than 20 years of providing excellent service to clients 1985-2006" Former Prosecutor
This newsletter is produced to be sent electronically. If you know someone who would also like to receive this email newsletter, please have them email us at newsletter@njlaws.com.
Free T- shirts and car coffee holders to all current and past clients. Please come into office.
Editor's Note and Disclaimer: All materials Copyright 2006. You may pass along the information on the NJ Laws Newsletter and website, provided the name and address of the Law Office is included.
Always schedule an office appointment with an experienced attorney when you have a legal matter. The Rules of Court limit an attorney's ability to discuss matters over the phone. If you have legal questions, you should schedule an in- office consultation.
Removals handled by webmaster lonekeep.com. To remove, email back & type in subject line "remove". Removals are performed by the webmaster Lonekeep once per month.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)